Template:SourceReview

Usage
Use this template for pages which have been refactored, for which the source citations may need to be reviewed.

An occasion on which this may happen is when a page with more than one proof on it has been split up into (e.g.) three: a master page "Theorem Name", and two subpages "Theorem Name/Proof 1" and "Theorem Name/Proof 2".

In the usual case, only one of those pages will contain material which was used to build the page. This will be either the master page (if the theorem was stated without proof) or a particular proof subpage if that proof was given in the source together with the theorem.

There are more complicated occurrences than that, but the above gives the gist.

To use the template, you need to add:

or:

or:

or:

to the code on the page which needs the source reviewed.

In the above,  is the username of the editor who put the original source citation in place.

This page may be the result of a refactoring operation.

As such, the following source works, along with any process flow, will need to be reviewed.

If you have access to any of these works, then you are invited to [ review this list, and make any necessary corrections].

When you have done this, move the citation of that source work (if it is appropriate that it stay on this page) above this message, into the usual chronological ordering.

When this has been done for all of the sources below,  should be removed from the code.