Talk:Nakayama's Lemma

As this topic is introduced on Wikipedia, it has 4 parts to it. Are you able to reconcile this? (Yes I know we're not just duplicateing WP on this site - I just like to refer back to it.) --prime mover 00:24, 9 March 2011 (CST)


 * I'll add Statements 3. and 4. as corollaries.


 * Statement 1. is encompassed by Cayley-Hamilton and the proof is the same, but it is worth a mention on this page since it gives an alternative proof of Nakayama. --Linus44 07:30, 9 March 2011 (CST)