Ordering is Equivalent to Subset Relation

Theorem
Let $\left({S, \preceq}\right)$ be a poset.

Then there exists a set $\mathbb S$ of subsets of $S$ such that:
 * $\left({S, \preceq}\right) \cong \left({\mathbb S, \subseteq}\right)$

where:
 * $\left({\mathbb S, \subseteq}\right)$ is the relational structure consisting of $\mathbb S$ and the subset relation;
 * $\cong$ denotes order isomorphism.

Hence the subset relation is, up to order isomorphism, the only ordering there is on a given set of subsets.

Proof
From Subset Relation is Ordering, we have that $\left({\mathbb S, \subseteq}\right)$ is a poset.

For each $a \in S$:
 * Let $S_a = \left({b \in S: b \preceq a}\right\}$;
 * Let $T = \left({S_a: a \in S}\right\}$.

Let us define a mapping $\phi: S \to T$ as:
 * $\phi \left({a}\right) = S_a$.

We show that $\phi$ is an order isomorphism.

$\phi$ is clearly surjective, as every $S_a$ is defined from some $a \in S$.

Now suppose $S_x, S_y \in T: S_x = S_y$.

Then $\left({b \in S: b \preceq x}\right\} = \left({b \in S: b \preceq y}\right\}$.

We have that $x \in S_x = S_y$ and $y \in S_y = S_x$ which means $x \preceq y$ and $y \preceq x$.

So as an ordering is antisymmetric, we have $x = y$ and so $\phi$ is injective.

Hence by definition, $\phi$ is a bijection.

Now let $a_1 \preceq a_2$. Then by definition, $a_1 \in S_{a_2}$.

Let $a_3 \in S_{a_1}$.

Then by definition, $a_3 \preceq a_1$.

As an ordering is transitive, it follows that $a_3 \preceq a_2$ and so $a_3 \in S_{a_2}$.

So by definition of a subset, $S_{a_1} \subseteq S_{a_2}$.

Thus it follows that $\phi$ is an order isomorphism between $\left({S, \preceq}\right)$ and $\left({\mathbb S, \subseteq}\right)$.