Reductio ad Absurdum/Variant 2/Proof 1

Theorem

 * $\neg p \implies \left({q \land \neg q}\right) \vdash p$

Also see
Because of their similarity in form, many authors treat the Reductio Ad Absurdum and the Proof by Contradiction as two aspects of the same thing.

From the point of view of purely classical logic, this is acceptable. However, in the context of intuitionistic logic, it is essential to bear in mind that only the Proof by Contradiction is valid.

Linguistic Note
Reductio ad absurdum is Latin for reduction to absurdity.