Definition talk:Scope

With the transclusion in place on Definition:Scope (Logic), is this disambiguation really serving a purpose? &mdash; Lord_Farin (talk) 17:51, 17 January 2014 (UTC)


 * At the moment maybe not, but I anticipate that it might be in the future. Your call: if you think it keeps the place tidier to delete it then go for it -- but if you think it might be a good idea to keep it in place so as to be there when we unearth different definitions for "scope", then that is also your call. I'm not too concerned either way on this decision. --prime mover (talk) 22:55, 17 January 2014 (UTC)