Characterization of Hausdorff Property in terms of Nets

Theorem
Let $\struct {X, \tau}$ be a topological space.

We have that $\struct {X, \tau}$ is Hausdorff convergent Moore-Smith sequences have a unique limit.

That is, whenever $\struct {\Lambda, \preceq}$ is a directed set, $x, y \in X$ and $\family {x_\lambda}_{\lambda \in \Lambda}$ is a Moore-Smith sequence converging to $x$ and $y$ in $\struct {X, \tau}$, we have $x = y$.

Necessary Condition
Suppose that $\struct {X, \tau}$ is Hausdorff.

Let $\struct {\Lambda, \preceq}$ is a directed set, $x, y \in X$ and $\family {x_\lambda}_{\lambda \in \Lambda}$ is a Moore-Smith sequence converging to $x$ and $y$ in $\struct {X, \tau}$.

AimForCont suppose that $x \ne y$.

Since $\struct {X, \tau}$ is Hausdorff there exists open neighborhoods $U$ and $V$ of $x$ and $y$ respectively such that $U \cap V = \O$.

Since $\family {x_\lambda}_{\lambda \in \Lambda}$ converges to $x$, there exists $\lambda_x \in \Lambda$ such that:


 * $x_\lambda \in U$ for $\lambda_x \preceq \lambda$.

Since $\family {x_\lambda}_{\lambda \in \Lambda}$ converges to $y$, there exists $\lambda_y \in \Lambda$ such that:


 * $x_\lambda \in U$ for $\lambda_y \preceq \lambda$.

Since $\struct {\Lambda, \preceq}$ is a directed set, there exists $\lambda_\ast \in \Lambda$ such that:


 * $\lambda_x \preceq \lambda_\ast$ and $\lambda_y \preceq \lambda_\ast$.

Then:


 * $x_{\lambda_\ast} \in U$

and:


 * $x_{\lambda_\ast} \in V$

But then $x_{\lambda_\ast} \in U \cap V = \O$, contradiction.

So we have $x = y$.

Sufficient Condition
Suppose that $\struct {X, \tau}$ is not Hausdorff.

Then there exists distinct $x, y \in X$ such that:


 * for all open neighborhoods $U$ and $V$ of $x$ and $y$ respectively, we have $U \cap V \ne \O$.

Let:


 * $\FF = \set {\tuple {U, V} : U \text { and } V \text { are open with } x \in U, \, y \in V}$

Define a preordering $\sqsubseteq$ on $\FF$ by:


 * $\tuple {U, V} \sqsubseteq \tuple {U', V'}$




 * $U \supseteq U'$ and $V \supseteq V'$.

From Product of Directed Sets is Directed Set, we have that $\FF$ is directed.

For each $\tuple {U, V} \in \FF$, pick:


 * $x_{\tuple {U, V} } \in U \cap V$

We show that $\family {x_{\tuple {U, V} } }_{\tuple {U, V} \in \FF}$ converges to $x$ and $y$.

Let $U'$ be an open neighborhood of $x$.

Then for $\tuple {U', X} \in \FF$ with $\tuple {U', X} \sqsubseteq \tuple {U, V}$, we have:


 * $x_{\tuple {U, V} } \in U \cap V \subseteq U \subseteq U'$

Similarly, let $V'$ be an open neighborhood of $Y$.

Then for $\tuple {X, V'} \in \FF$ with $\tuple {X, V'} \sqsubseteq \tuple {U, V}$ we have:


 * $x_{\tuple {U, V} } \in U \cap V \subseteq V \subseteq V'$

So $\family {x_{\tuple {U, V} } }_{\tuple {U, V} \in \FF}$ converges to $x$ and $y$ with $x \ne y$.

So:


 * whenever $\struct {\Lambda, \preceq}$ is a directed set, $x, y \in X$ and $\family {x_\lambda}_{\lambda \in \Lambda}$ is a Moore-Smith sequence converging to $x$ and $y$ in $\struct {X, \tau}$, we have $x = y$

does not hold, and we are done by Proof by Contraposition.