Derivative of Geometric Sequence

Theorem
If $x \in \R: \left|{x}\right| < 1$, then:


 * $\displaystyle \sum_{n \ge 1} n x^{n-1} = \frac 1 {\left({1-x}\right)^2}$

Corollary

 * $\displaystyle \sum_{n \ge 1} n \left({n+1}\right) x^{n-1} = \frac 2 {\left({1-x}\right)^3}$

Proof
We have from Power Rule for Derivatives that:
 * $\displaystyle \frac {\mathrm d} {\mathrm d x} \sum_{n \ge 1} x^n = \sum_{n \ge 1} n x^{n-1}$

But from Sum of Infinite Geometric Progression:
 * $\displaystyle \sum_{n \ge 1} x^n = \frac 1 {1-x}$

The result follows by Power Rule for Derivatives and the Chain Rule applied to $\dfrac 1 {1-x}$.

Proof of Corollary
We have from Power Rule for Derivatives that:
 * $\displaystyle \frac d {dx} \sum_{n \ge 1} \left({n+1}\right) x^n = \sum_{n \ge 1} n \left({n+1}\right) x^{n-1}$

But from Sum of Infinite Geometric Progression:
 * $\displaystyle \sum_{n \ge 1} \left({n+1}\right) x^n = \frac 1 {1-x}$

The result follows by Power Rule for Derivatives and the Chain Rule applied to $\dfrac 1 {\left({1-x}\right)^2}$.

Comment
Why should the more complicated second derivative result be a corollary of the (on the surface) easier first derivative result?

Because the clever bit is thinking of the differentiation technique in the first place. Applying it to the second result is just an exercise in application.