Talk:Inner Limit in Hausdorff Space by Open Neighborhoods

I tidied up the article according to the house style. If there is some problem, please leave a comment here.
 * On PW, we strive for short sentences; this usually means a hard double break between sentences like this:


 * This convention does not apply to discussion pages, where it is deemed too cumbersome. Furthermore, the inline equations appear nicer when used in the following manner (note the colon at the start; the indentation can be increased further by adding more colons):


 * $\displaystyle \int_0^1 \cos \ \theta \mathrm d \theta$;


 * That is, for above example:


 *  :$\displaystyle \int_0^1 \cos \theta \mathrm d \theta$ 


 * The  \displaystyle  command prevents the above from looking like:


 * $\int_0^1 \cos \theta \ \mathrm d \theta$.


 * Other environments like the eqn-template have their own rules. For more information, I refer to Help:Editing. --Lord_Farin 11:47, 24 November 2011 (CST)


 * Good work on an excellent page - but I'd be tempted to do a refactoring job on it still. There's about 5 propositions being proved on this page. What we need to do is split these out into separate pages, one for each proposition. We might also raise separate pages for the specific definitions needed, but a quick glance suggests this has already been addressed.
 * In any case, there are some interesting notations, in particular $\mho$ for set of neighborhoods which we really need to take on board.
 * I'll try to get to this sometime in the next few days if someone doesn't beat me to it. --prime mover 11:53, 24 November 2011 (CST)

Section for Notation
I'm looking at the section at the top of the page saying "Notation". My instant reaction was "We don't do it like this" and to refactor it so as to introduce the definition of the notation in the body of the text.

Then I thought: Why not have a section at the top of each page which warrants it that introduces any unusual notation? It would limit the tendency for people to say "I don't like / understand the notation you use so I'm changing it".

Any thoughts, anybody who's following this? --prime mover 07:42, 26 November 2011 (CST)