Talk:Gauss's Lemma (Polynomial Theory)

Notes to self/future editors, since I don't think I'll have time to make the changes this evening (can't remember if I started this page or not, the mistakes could be mine):
 * the statement is false in general if $\deg h = 0$. Statement is updated, but there must be details in the sufficient condition part of the proof missing, since presumably this fact is not used
 * necessary condition isn't quite so obvious, cf. notion of an inert embedding of rings (as defined by Cohn, Algebra) --Linus44 (talk) 19:42, 8 March 2013 (UTC)


 * It wasn't your page, worry not. This is your first time to touch it. Feel free to take it on whenever you like. --prime mover (talk) 19:49, 8 March 2013 (UTC)