Definition talk:Fiber Bundle

Is this page alright now (exluding the two dead links at the bottom)? --Geometry dude (talk) 17:13, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Yeah that's more the thing. I've given it a tidy and left a question. Note that when a concept is specifically defined "with respect to an entity" or "on an entity" and so on, we make a point of referring to the complete definition so as to make it completely clear what is being referred to.


 * You might want to make a note of some of the specific tidying that's been done. In particular:


 * and not  -- this is specifically because $\LaTeX$ then interprets "pr" as being an operator and performs some subtle spacing adjustment around it so as to be consistent with e.g.   and so on.


 * We tend only to use  when it specifically has an effect on the formatting: ,   and so on. This is all in the house style guidelines.


 * Please do not use the versions of links with underscores. It limits the usefulness of global searches, for a start, and there was something else we found where it causes something else not to work so well.


 * One more thing: we try to limit the contents of the "Also see" section to immediately relevant stuff. At the most I'd put Fiber (Relation) and Bundle Projection in it. Oh yes, and now I know what it is, Model Fiber. Otherwise a reader trying to trace something through is likely to get sidetracked by material of only marginal relevance. --prime mover (talk) 18:20, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Oh yes okay, so a lot of those definitions refer to parts of the fiber bundle. It's a bit of a mess, I may try and sort out the best way to present it. Trouble is it's Friday again. --prime mover (talk) 20:24, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


 * This also regards the explaination thingy you put there. It's properly called a fiber bundle over $M$ with model fiber $F$. I'm just gonna write "a fiber bundle over M" then. --Geometry dude (talk) 13:24, 22 September 2014 (UTC)