Infinite Sequence Property of Strictly Well-Founded Relation/Reverse Implication/Proof 1

Proof
Suppose $\RR$ is not a strictly well-founded relation.

So by definition there exists a non-empty subset $T$ of $S$ which has no strictly minimal element.

Let $a \in T$.

Since $a$ is not strictly minimal in $T$, we can find $b \in T: b \mathrel \RR a$.

This holds for all $a \in T$.

Hence the restriction $\RR \restriction_{T \times T}$ of $\RR$ to $T \times T$ is a right-total endorelation on $T$.

So, by the Axiom of Dependent Choice, it follows that there is an infinite sequence $\sequence {a_n}$ in $T$ such that:
 * $\forall n \in \N: a_{n + 1} \mathrel \RR a_n$

It follows by the Rule of Transposition that if there is no infinite sequence $\sequence {a_n}$ of elements of $S$ such that:
 * $\forall n \in \N: a_{n + 1} \mathrel \RR a_n$

then $\RR$ is a strictly well-founded relation.