G-Tower is Well-Ordered under Subset Relation/Union of Limit Elements

Theorem
Let $M$ be a class.

Let $g: M \to M$ be a progressing mapping on $M$.

Let $M$ be a $g$-tower.

Let $x \in M$ be a limit element of $M$.

Then:
 * $x = \ds \bigcup x^\subset$

where $\ds \bigcup x^\subset$ denotes the union of the lower section of $x$.

Proof
We have that $g$-Tower is Well-Ordered under Subclass Relation.

Let $x \in M$ be a limit element of $M$.

Then by definition $x$ is not an immediate successor element.

Hence by $g$-Tower is Well-Ordered under Subclass Relation: Successor of Non-Greatest Element:
 * there exists no $y \in M$ such that $x = \map g y$

otherwise $x$ would be the immediate successor of $y$.

Hence there is no $y \in x^\subset$ such that $x = \map g y$.

Thus condition $(\text C 1)$ of $g$-Tower is Well-Ordered under Subclass Relation: Corollary does not hold.

Hence condition $(\text C 2)$ of $g$-Tower is Well-Ordered under Subclass Relation: Corollary does hold.

That is:
 * $\ds \bigcup x^\subset = x$