Talk:Derivative of Exponential at Zero

The title of this page is quite odd; more accurate would be:


 * Derivative of Exponential at Zero

Sigh; all those links waiting to be adapted. --Lord_Farin 07:40, 17 February 2012 (EST)


 * Sounds good. I vote the person who first complained about the title be the one who has to change the links, isn't that fair? :P --GFauxPas 07:43, 17 February 2012 (EST)


 * Hail to the option 'Move subpages'; that just saved some time. --Lord_Farin 07:45, 17 February 2012 (EST)
 * ...and done. --Lord_Farin 07:56, 17 February 2012 (EST)


 * Mind, I'm still uncertain about the wisdom of deleting the original page it came from, unless it's seriously misleading or inaccurate or badly-spelled. You never know who might be linking to it from an external site. --prime mover 13:55, 17 February 2012 (EST)


 * I understand your point of view (hadn't considered external linking; I have done that on some hand-in assignments though), but one could also argue that external links should be updated, and nothing works better than simply invalidating the link. I have taken your comment to heart in the sense that I carefully relinked all internal refs before removing the page (note the 'carefully'). --Lord_Farin 17:25, 17 February 2012 (EST)
 * Another note: I'm not sure I agree with removing the literature reference from the main page; I agree that the next and previous 'operators' should point to the instantiated proof, though. The result as such is stated in the work and hence IMO deserves a reference. I meant for the correct proof to get a literature ref. --Lord_Farin 17:27, 17 February 2012 (EST)