Talk:Quotient Ring is Ring

I'd rather the page Quotient Group of Ideal is Coset were not merged into this one yet, as this is a (albeit woolly) specific result in the reference given. It might need tightening up conceptually, but it needs to stay up for a while yet, till I've had the chance of tidying up.

Sorry, I haven't been paying attention to business this weekend, I've had a rather time-consuming laborious project on which has taken up most of my time and headspace. Normal service may resume soon. --prime mover 17:32, 22 April 2012 (EDT)


 * First things first; we allow you to have a life (at least in principle :) ). --Lord_Farin 11:13, 23 April 2012 (EDT)
 * Should we enforce the 'no link in title unless subpage' rule on proofs like this? I can see possible problems emerging if we don't. --Lord_Farin 11:21, 23 April 2012 (EDT)


 * Yes I think we should. Odd: I could have sworn I'd removed those links. Better do it now. --prime mover 16:15, 23 April 2012 (EDT)

I've had a further look and see no reason to merge. But it does need renaming. --prime mover 14:05, 29 April 2012 (EDT)