Talk:Minkowski's Inequality for Sums

"The previous statement of the inequality is false if, among other cases, $a_k=b_k$ for all $k$."

Are you sure, or do you mean $a_k = - b_k$? And can you back this up? I can find this nowhere in the literature.

And removing a mathematical equation and replacing it with "...the reverse inequality holds" is not in tune with the philosophy of this site. I'm tempted to revert your recent edits here unless you can back them up, because I don't trust them. --prime mover 02:12, 13 March 2012 (EDT)

Scope of Refactoring
Refactoring is a specific exercise that restructures existing proofs into a different format, usually by splitting pages up into transcluded subpages. I really don't want to complicate that process any more than it already is by adding extra nice-to-haves to the required proofs. The Reverse Minkowski Inequality is a different result and therefore lives on a completely different page. If you want it, write a page for it, or add it to the "proofs wanted" list. Otherwise it just sounds like the usual list of random household chores my wife prattles out at me every half hour. --prime mover (talk) 15:43, 4 November 2012 (UTC)