Compactness Theorem for Boolean Interpretations/Proof 1

Proof
Suppose $\mathbf H$ does not have a model.

By the Main Lemma of Propositional Tableaus, $\mathbf H$ has a tableau confutation $T$.

By Tableau Confutation contains Finite Tableau Confutation, $T$ may be assumed to be finite.

Hence the set $\mathbf H'$ of all WFFs in $\mathbf H$ used somewhere in $T$ is finite.

Now, let $T'$ be the labeled tree which is the same as $T$ but with root $\mathbf H'$ instead of $\mathbf H$.

Then $T'$ is a tableau confutation of $\mathbf H'$.

By the Tableau Confutation implies Unsatisfiable, $\mathbf H'$ has no models.

But this contradicts the assumption that all finite subsets of $\mathbf H$ have models.

Hence the result.