Talk:Converse Hinge Theorem

Should we link to Trichotomy Law on the $$\not> \implies < or =$$ step? --Cynic (talk) 05:04, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Could do, even though Euclid himself had not conceived of this. He didn't delve too deeply into relation theory. Mind, it would not be out of place, perhaps make a comment in the Trichotomy page to indicate that it's sort of a "taken for granted" property in Euclid etc. I'm not familiar enough with the details here, unfortunately, without a lot of research. --Matt Westwood 06:34, 17 March 2010 (UTC)