Definition talk:Integrable Function/Unbounded

This definition is inconsistent with Negative Part, due to the definition of that on differing from the source work. This needs to be corrected. How are definition conflicts between sources usually resolved on ? --CircuitCraft (talk) 01:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Broman actually uses the "also defined as" implementation of the definition, so to be strictly technically correct it does not actually differ from the source work. --prime mover (talk) 08:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)


 * But anyway, what I have put in place is what we do on . --prime mover (talk) 09:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)