Talk:Praeclarum Theorema

PM, can we have one of your lovely linguistic notes here? --GFauxPas 06:50, 6 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Doesn't need a linguistic note so much as a rewrite to remove all the extraneous material. It's on my list of stuff to do but I'm unsure as to whether to completely dispense with the graphical technique or, if not, exactly how to sideline it. --prime mover 17:06, 6 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Very nice. Is that how you would like references to metamath to be from now on? Speak now or forever be annoyed at inconsistency :) --Jshflynn (talk) 23:01, 7 February 2013 (UTC)


 * No, not yet - I have to craft a template along the lines of the PlanetMath or Mathworld ones. At the moment I'm not certain what the required format of citations of that site are supposed to be - or even if they have one. Hang fire on this - I need head space to get this done.
 * The existing metamath link was none of my doing, it was put there by a contributor who didn't (and didn't appear to want to) understand the site hilosophy and just posted up (without changes) the encyclopedic, overly-intellectual and narcissistically-scholarly pages from his own pompous website. One day I will get round to chewing them up and spitting them out again. --prime mover (talk) 23:20, 7 February 2013 (UTC)