Transfinite Induction/Principle 1

Theorem
Let $\operatorname{On}$ denote the class of all ordinals.

Let $A$ denote a class.

Suppose that:
 * For all elements $x$ of $\operatorname{On}$, if $x$ is a subset of $A$, then $x$ is an element of $A$.

Then $\operatorname{On} \subseteq A$.

Proof
that $\neg \operatorname{On} \subseteq A$.

Then:
 * $\left({\operatorname{On} \setminus A}\right) \ne \varnothing$

From Set Difference is Subset, $\operatorname{On} \setminus A$ is a subclass of the ordinals.

By Epsilon Relation is Strongly Well-Founded on Ordinal Class, $\operatorname{On} \setminus A$ must have a $\in$-minimal element $y$.

By Element of Ordinal is Ordinal, $y$ must be a subset of $\operatorname{On}$, the class of all ordinals.

However, from the fact that $y$ is a $\in$-minimal element of $\operatorname{On} \setminus A$:


 * $\left({\operatorname{On} \setminus A}\right) \cap y = \varnothing$.

So by its subsethood of $\operatorname{On}$:
 * $\left({\operatorname{On} \cap y}\right) \setminus A = \left({y \setminus A}\right) = \varnothing$

Therefore $y \subseteq A$.

However, by the hypothesis, $y$ must also be an element of $A$.

This contradicts the fact that $y$ is an element of $\operatorname{On} \setminus A$.

Therefore $\operatorname{On} \subseteq A$.