Talk:Converse Hinge Theorem

Should we link to Trichotomy Law on the $$\not> \implies < or =$$ step? --Cynic (talk) 05:04, 17 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Could do, even though Euclid himself had not conceived of this. He didn't delve too deeply into relation theory. Mind, it would not be out of place, perhaps make a comment in the Trichotomy page to indicate that it's sort of a "taken for granted" property in Euclid etc. I'm not familiar enough with the details here, unfortunately, without a lot of research. --Matt Westwood 06:34, 17 March 2010 (UTC)