Talk:Euclid's Lemma

Any particular reason proofwiki's Euclid's Lemma is different from Wikipedia's?


 * Yes, because it wasn't copied from Wikipedia. Its wording, as is, matches the sources presented. We (deliberately) make no particular effort to ensure we match Wikipedia. --prime mover (talk) 07:29, 31 December 2018 (EST)

One possible concern is the converse to Euclid's Lemma for primes is true but converse to generalised Euclid's Lemma is false...


 * This would indeed have been a concern if this page had included the converse. But as it doesn't, it's not. --prime mover (talk) 07:29, 31 December 2018 (EST)