Talk:Left Inverse Mapping is Surjection

Non-sensical revert
I put the original result up, stated in the usual style, at Injection has Surjective Left Inverse Mapping.

What I put here is the result that matches the title.

Effectively, I made this page look like Right Inverse Mapping is Injection once I removed the unnecessary premise from that. Please put it back how you found it. --Dfeuer (talk) 19:38, 1 May 2013 (UTC)


 * No, you write a new page if you want to write something different to what's there. --prime mover (talk) 20:57, 1 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Please. PLEASE. Just READ the titles, and read the theorems, and you will understand very clearly why I did what I did. --Dfeuer (talk) 20:59, 1 May 2013 (UTC)


 * DO NOT, REPEAT, DO NOT, CHANGE A PROOF INTO ONE YOU LIKE BETTER BECAUSE IN YOUR OH SO EVER SO MIGHTILY HUMBLE OPINION THE TITLE DOES NOT MATCH THE CONTENTS. WRITE A NEW PROOF TO SAY EXACTLY WHAT YOU DO WANT TO SAY, AND AS FOR THE EXISTING PROOF, THE MOST YOU MAY DO TO IT IS REQUEST A RENAME.


 * IF YOU DEFY THE RULES ONE MORE TIME YOU ARE BLOCKED FOR EVER. WAKARIMASU KA!?!?!?!? --prime mover (talk) 21:16, 1 May 2013 (UTC)