Definition talk:Bounded

Current house style would prefer this a disambiguation, different fields being invoked. --Lord_Farin 13:41, 14 May 2012 (EDT)


 * Each section one of a separate disambiguation? Or separating them out into two sections? How do you plan this? Because I see it as all part of the same thing, the same definition just on different things. In short, I don't think this would work so well being disambiguated. Which is the canonical "house style" where a disambig is used that this should be like? --prime mover 14:12, 14 May 2012 (EDT)


 * Definition:Vector is going in the desired direction but is unfinished as of now. I think the ordered set should be separated from the metric space at the very least, not sure if further splitting is necessary. --Lord_Farin 14:25, 14 May 2012 (EDT)


 * Okay ... I'll give it some thought when I come back this way again. --prime mover 14:58, 14 May 2012 (EDT)

Work is now in progress to turn this page into a disambiguation -- separating out Bounded Set, Bounded Mapping and Bounded Sequence into their separate page-structures. This will make it all less unwieldy. Then all of Bounded Above and Below, Bound, Upper Bound and Lower Bound to have the same thing done. --prime mover (talk) 20:18, 3 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Excellent work once more. &mdash; Lord_Farin (talk) 22:50, 3 March 2014 (UTC)


 * I needed to do it, because I need to clarify the concept of "bounded" in the complex plane. --prime mover (talk) 22:52, 3 March 2014 (UTC)


 * A chain of such "needs" brought me from functional analysis to PropLog :). &mdash; Lord_Farin (talk) 22:59, 3 March 2014 (UTC)