Definition talk:Subdivision (Graph Theory)

Hi.

I already read the house style guide, but I can not figure out what is wrong with this page. So, could someone please tell me what are the problems with this page? I would like to fix them in order to remove the "refactor" and "Tidy" tags (and also, to familiarize me with the standards of Proof Wiki).

Thank you very much.


 * a) No underscores in links
 * b) All entities in brackets to use \left({ and }\right), or \left\{ { }\right\} etc.
 * c) Vertical spacing between sections
 * d) Indication of sections of cited works
 * e) Subsections, in general, go into separate transcluded pages
 * f) Styling of titles
 * g) Links to subpages use redirects


 * One final point: please sign your posts on talk pages.


 * --prime mover (talk) 13:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Are the items a) to d) OK now? I understand what you say on item e), but I would like more explanations about f) and g) if possible. Thanks. -- Hilder.vitor (talk) 13:58, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * a) you missed a couple
 * b) brackets of all kinds, not just braces, note the missing braces added
 * f) see what I did -- capital letters for major words
 * g) see what I did for Edge of Graph.


 * e) still to be done
 * --prime mover (talk) 14:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * What about now? Can we say item e) is done? -- Hilder.vitor (talk) 18:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * No, there's a better way to present this. I'll get to it. --prime mover (talk) 21:52, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Refactoring
This page, and its subpages, is now fully compliant with the house style.

Please note that the final touches to a page are usually done by the site administrators as a tidy-up exercise. Thus the use of the "tidy" template. It is a message to us that a page has work to be done on it, not an instruction to the person who has originally written the page that they are to do this work.

We are of course delighted with contributors who pick up the house style and make an effort to use it, but we understand that some may not want to spend a lot of time on details like this.

Many thanks for your contributions, and please continue with this good work. --prime mover (talk) 07:59, 17 June 2016 (UTC)