Definition talk:Associate

I messed up before -- this is the mathematically correct arrangement of things, if not the correct transclusion layout. --Linus44 (talk) 20:46, 26 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Beware of the necessity to sort out the links - I've recovered it, but a) there were some double redirects which are always ad news, and b) the source citations for Whitelaw and Clapham had been duplicated and the flow had been corrupted. When you refactor, and you don't have the source works to hand, use the Template:SourceReview at the bottom of the page where the sources are, so as to alert the maintenance team to the fact that they need to be revisited. --prime mover (talk) 21:37, 26 April 2013 (UTC)