Definition talk:Conjugate Closure

Why does this exist? &mdash; Lord_Farin (talk) 10:37, 12 November 2017 (EST)
 * I made this a disambiguation page (instead of a redirect to Definition:Generated Normal Subgroup) because it is likely that "conjugate closure" appears in other contexts. Or, if you want, because the name is not so specific. --barto (talk) (contribs) 10:47, 12 November 2017 (EST)

Whatever, I suppose it doesn't hurt anyone :) &mdash; Lord_Farin (talk) 10:56, 12 November 2017 (EST)

You'll see that I have done this in other cases too. For some of them it's clear that it should be a disambiguation (e.g. because I added some red links), others are questionable, like here. --barto (talk) (contribs) 11:03, 12 November 2017 (EST)

We can consider introducing a ReservedForDisambig template (or, reserved for disambig, if you prefer :) ) clarifying why it is a disambig if it has only 1 link. --barto (talk) (contribs) 11:03, 12 November 2017 (EST)

Rollback
I promised I was going to butt out of this increasingly shambolic car-crash of a website, but in this case I have to protest about deleting content. --prime mover (talk) 11:13, 12 November 2017 (EST)
 * It has been moved to Definition:Generated Normal Subgroup. --barto (talk) (contribs) 11:23, 12 November 2017 (EST)
 * Notation got lost in the move; now fixed. --barto (talk) (contribs) 11:27, 12 November 2017 (EST)