Equivalence of Definitions of Generalized Ordered Space/Definition 1 implies Definition 3

Theorem
Let $\left({X, \preceq, \tau}\right)$ be a generalized ordered space by Definition 1.

That is, $\left({X, \tau}\right)$ is a Hausdorff space with a basis consisting of convex sets.

Then $\left({X, \preceq, \tau}\right)$ is a generalized ordered space by Definition 3.

That is, $\left({X, \tau}\right)$ is a Hausdorff space with a sub-basis consisting of upper and lower sets.

Proof
 Let $\mathcal B$ be a basis for $\tau$ consisting of convex sets.

Let:
 * $\mathcal S = \left\{ {U^\succeq: U \in \mathcal B}\right\} \cup \left\{ {U^\preceq: U \in \mathcal B}\right\}$

where $U^\succeq$ and $U^\preceq$ denote the upper closure and lower closure respectively of $U$.

By Upper Closure is Upper Set and Lower Closure is Lower Set, the elements of $\mathcal S$ are upper and lower sets.

It is to be shown that $\mathcal S$ is a sub-basis for $\tau$.

By Upper and Lower Closures of Open Set in GO-Space are Open:
 * $\mathcal S \subseteq \tau$

By Convex Set Characterization (Order Theory), each element of $\mathcal B$ is the intersection of its upper closure with its lower closure.

Thus each element of $\mathcal B$ is generated by $\mathcal S$.

Thus $\mathcal S$ is a sub-basis for $\tau$.