Talk:Sum of Integrals on Adjacent Intervals for Continuous Functions

Your final "Comment" section reads like: "If we only had some eggs, we could have ham and eggs, if we only had some ham." --prime mover 18:20, 22 January 2012 (EST)
 * I do not like green eggs and ham. --GFauxPas 19:07, 22 January 2012 (EST)

I want to create a version of this theorem for complex integrals. My intention is to call the new theorem Sum of Integrals on Adjacent Intervals/Corollary, and write the theorem on a subpage of this page. Or, should I instead call the new theorem Sum of Complex Integrals on Adjacent Intervals? --Anghel (talk) 22:42, 5 December 2012 (UTC)


 * You could make the latter a redirect to the former, or, which I prefer, put it as a corollary on this page, but do not create it as a subpage, but properly on its own page with the suggested second title. Cf. Definition:Exponential (Category Theory) and Definition:Category with Exponentials. It is my experience that this practice makes web searches on PW more effective. --Lord_Farin (talk) 22:53, 5 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I disagree - making a subpage has the added advantage that a link to the parent page is available at the top of the page so you can directly go there and view the page in its full context - which you miss if you merely transclude a random page which is not a subpage. --prime mover (talk) 23:05, 5 December 2012 (UTC)


 * In this case the corollary is a proper generalization; I use this construction sparsely, when I feel an Also see would be too weak an indication of the connection of the results. In general, the construction you advocate is to be the default approach; I'm merely suggesting another approach may have its merit in certain cases. --Lord_Farin (talk) 23:34, 5 December 2012 (UTC)