Definition talk:Strict Predecessor

I prefer a structure as for Definition:Succeed and Definition:Strictly Succeed, with this page and Definition:Strictly Precede merged. --Lord_Farin 17:54, 21 January 2012 (EST)

Hm, that typo came from the inconsistent naming apparently. Why is it Succeed and Precede? --Lord_Farin 17:55, 21 January 2012 (EST)


 * Oddity of language. It just is. --prime mover 18:34, 21 January 2012 (EST)


 * Okay fair enough, it makes little difference. I just found it useful to do it like that yesterday when I was rationalising all the various complexities of the definitions.