Definition talk:Shift of Finite Type

The page should be called Definitoin:Two-sided Shift of Finite Type--Usagiop (talk) 20:23, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Is that name the standard one? (/is just saying "shift of finite type" incorrect?) Usually the first name picked sticks unless there are compelling reasons to change it. Caliburn (talk) 20:37, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes and no. If you say shift of finite type, then it is not clear if it is one-sided or two-sided. When I create this page, I thought two-sided is the standard, but now I do not think so. The (one-sided) shift of finite type is as common as (two-sided) shift of finite type.--Usagiop (talk) 21:34, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I want to rename the page but I do not know how to.--Usagiop (talk) 21:36, 1 June 2022 (UTC)


 * No, leave it as it is. Do it the same way we do identities and inverses and so on. --prime mover (talk) 23:30, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

I need to refactor the introduction of topology.--Usagiop (talk) 00:55, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Topology is an essential part of the definition of the concept.--Usagiop (talk) 19:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)