Category talk:Bijections

Why the removal of the Also see section?
 * It does make sense. Copying the also see section of a definition to its category means duplicated text, and requires doing the same edit to it twice. If anything, transclude it, but the category pages are messy enough already imo. --barto (talk) (contribs) 18:55, 13 January 2018 (EST)


 * There is an inconsistency of approach if there is a deliberate attempt to keep the category pages simple (3 sections is "messy"?) while at the same time, for example, adding a host of subcategories to the "Also see" section on many other pages in the site. I'm fairly okay with all the subsectioning of Also see which is happening all around, but if you're happy enough with such an increase in visual complexity on a conventional definition page, where's the problem in adding just one more section to a Category page?


 * There have been times (in particular when developing the sections on Trigonometry) where I needed to be able to quickly jump between the categories for the various functions: Sine, Cosine, Tangent and so on. It makes sense to keep them in, because it is convenient. --prime mover (talk) 19:45, 13 January 2018 (EST)
 * You can ignore all but the last 10 words of my first reply.
 * I was confusing some things. Makes sense now. --barto (talk) (contribs) 03:32, 14 January 2018 (EST)


 * I have replaced that section. We may need (rather: will need) to amend the SubjectCategory templates so as to make sure the spacing is consistenly applied, but removing the section because it is "messy" is a suboptimal move. Imo. --prime mover (talk) 04:54, 14 January 2018 (EST)