Metric Space Completeness is not Preserved by Homeomorphism

Theorem
Let $M_1 = \left({A_1, d_1}\right)$ and $M_2 = \left({A_2, d_2}\right)$ be metric spaces.

Let $\phi: M_1 \to M_2$ be a homeomorphism.

If $M_1$ is complete then it is not necessarily the case that so is $M_2$.

Proof
Let $\Z_{>0}$ be the set of (strictly) positive integers.

Let $d: \Z_{>0} \times \Z_{>0} \to \R$ be the usual (Euclidean) metric on $\Z_{>0}$.

Let $\delta: \Z_{>0} \times \Z_{>0} \to \R$ be the metric on $\Z_{>0}$ defined as:
 * $\forall x, y \in \Z_{>0}: \delta \left({x, y}\right) = \dfrac {\left\lvert{x - y}\right\rvert} {x y}$

Let $\tau_d$ denote the metric topology for $d$.

Let $\tau_\delta$ denote the metric topology for $\delta$.

From Topologies induced by Usual Metric and Scaled Euclidean Metric on Positive Integers are Homeomorphic:
 * $\tau_d$ and $\tau_\delta$ are homeomorphic.

From Positive Integers under Usual Metric is Complete Metric Space:
 * $\left({\Z_{>0}, d}\right)$ is a complete metric space.

However, from Positive Integers under Scaled Euclidean Metric is not Complete Metric Space:
 * $\left({\Z_{>0}, \delta}\right)$ is not a complete metric space.

Hence the result.