169 as Sum of up to 155 Squares/Mistake

Source Work

 * The Dictionary
 * $169$
 * $169$

Mistake

 * In fact, $169$ can be written as the sum of $n$ non-zero squares, for all values of $n$ from $1$ to $155$, but for no larger values. [ Jackson, Masat and Mitchell, MM v61 41 ]

This is apparently untrue: $169$ can be expressed as the sum of $n$ non-zero squares for several values of $n$ greater than $155$, for example:

The citation given is also wrong. It should refer to volume $66$, not $61$: