Talk:Beta Function of x with y+m+1

I recommend the proof given here should be added as a second proof, and that we restore what was originally here, because they are totally different. We do not support the practice of replacing a proof with a different one, even though it may be the case that the second proof is "better". --prime mover (talk) 22:55, 4 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Fair enough - done. --Robkahn131 (talk) 23:57, 4 December 2022 (UTC)