Biconditional Elimination/Sequent Form
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
- $(1): \quad p \iff q \vdash p \implies q$
- $(2): \quad p \iff q \vdash q \implies p$
Proof 1
Form 1
By the tableau method of natural deduction:
Line | Pool | Formula | Rule | Depends upon | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | $p \iff q$ | Premise | (None) | ||
2 | 1 | $p \implies q$ | Biconditional Elimination: $\iff \EE_1$ | 1 |
$\blacksquare$
Form 2
By the tableau method of natural deduction:
Line | Pool | Formula | Rule | Depends upon | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | $p \iff q$ | Premise | (None) | ||
2 | 1 | $q \implies p$ | Biconditional Elimination: $\iff \EE_2$ | 1 |
$\blacksquare$
Proof 2
We apply the Method of Truth Tables.
$\begin{array}{|ccc||ccc|ccc|} \hline p & \iff & q & p & \implies & q & q & \implies & p \\ \hline F & T & F & F & T & F & F & T & F \\ F & F & T & F & T & T & T & F & F \\ T & F & F & T & F & F & F & T & T \\ T & T & T & T & F & T & T & T & T \\ \hline \end{array}$
As can be seen, when $p \iff q$ is true so are both $p \implies q$ and $q \implies p$.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 2000: Michael R.A. Huth and Mark D. Ryan: Logic in Computer Science: Modelling and reasoning about systems ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1.2.5$: An aside: proof by contradiction: Exercises $1.6: \ 7$