Carroll Paradox
This article needs proofreading. Please check it for mathematical errors. If you believe there are none, please remove {{Proofread}} from the code.To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Proofread}} from the code. |
Paradox
Modus Ponendo Ponens leads to infinite regress.
Proof
To be proven: $q$.
- $(1).\quad$ Assume $p \implies q$.
- $(2).\quad$ Assume $p$.
- $(3).\quad$ $p \land \paren {p \implies q} \vdash q$ by Modus Ponendo Ponens.
- $(4).\quad$ From $(2)$ and $(1)$, $p \land \paren {p \implies q}$.
- $(5).\quad \paren {p \land \paren {p \implies q} \land \paren {p \land \paren {p \implies q} } \vdash q} \vdash q$.
- $(6).\quad$ From $(4)$ and $(3)$, $\paren {p \land \paren {p \implies q} } \land \paren {\paren {p \land \paren {p \implies q} } \vdash q}$.
$\ldots$
and so ad infinitum (or, as Lewis Carroll put it, ad nauseaum).
Resolution
This is an antinomy.
It arises because of confusion between an logical axiom and a rule of inference.
In this context, Modus Ponendo Ponens is a rule of inference.
This article, or a section of it, needs explaining. In particular: exactly where Achilles's thinking goes wrong, in refusing to accept that $P, P \implies Q \vdash Q$ without first needing to accept as a logical axiom $\paren {P \land P \implies Q} \implies Q \vdash Q$ You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by explaining it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Explain}} from the code. |
Also known as
The Carroll paradox is also found in the literature as the Achilles paradox, from the nature of its exposition by Lewis Carroll.
However, the term Achilles paradox is also well established as the name of the paradox of Zeno which questions how Achilles can ever overtake a tortoise in a running race.
Source of Name
This entry was named for Lewis Carroll.
Historical Note
The Carroll Paradox was originally presented by Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, writing under the name Lewis Carroll.
He presented it as a whimsical conversation between Achilles and the tortoise he had been racing in the Achilles Paradox.
Sources
- 1979: Douglas R. Hofstadter: Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid: Two-Part Invention, quoting What the Tortoise Said to Achilles by Lewis Carroll
- 1989: Ephraim J. Borowski and Jonathan M. Borwein: Dictionary of Mathematics ... (previous) ... (next): Achilles paradox: 2.
- 1995: Charles Lutwidge Dodgson: What the Tortoise Said to Achilles (Mind Vol. 104, no. 416: pp. 691 – 693) www.jstor.org/stable/2254477