Category talk:Bijections
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Why the removal of the Also see section?
- It does make sense. Copying the also see section of a definition to its category means duplicated text, and requires doing the same edit to it twice. If anything, transclude it, but the category pages are messy enough already imo. --barto (talk) (contribs) 18:55, 13 January 2018 (EST)
- There is an inconsistency of approach if there is a deliberate attempt to keep the category pages simple (3 sections is "messy"?) while at the same time, for example, adding a host of subcategories to the "Also see" section on many other pages in the site. I'm fairly okay with all the subsectioning of Also see which is happening all around, but if you're happy enough with such an increase in visual complexity on a conventional definition page, where's the problem in adding just one more section to a Category page?
- There have been times (in particular when developing the sections on Trigonometry) where I needed to be able to quickly jump between the categories for the various functions: Sine, Cosine, Tangent and so on. It makes sense to keep them in, because it is convenient. --prime mover (talk) 19:45, 13 January 2018 (EST)
- I have replaced that section. We may need (rather: will need) to amend the SubjectCategory templates so as to make sure the spacing is consistenly applied, but removing the section because it is "messy" is a suboptimal move. Imo. --prime mover (talk) 04:54, 14 January 2018 (EST)
A good call. I was lazy. In some instances I also didn't see how to make this very accessible because the transcluded definition is quite big (e.g. including pictures).
I changed the template to address the excessive whitespace. It seems to be better now. — Lord_Farin (talk) 05:46, 14 January 2018 (EST)
- Better now, certainly. Sorry about the duplicate entry in Also see, seriously, I did not see it was already there. I need help with my eyes, they are getting worse. --prime mover (talk) 06:04, 14 January 2018 (EST)