Cauchy's Group Theorem
This proof is about Cauchy's Group Theorem. For other uses, see Cauchy's Theorem.
Theorem
Let $G$ be a finite group whose identity is $e$.
Let $p$ be a prime number which divides the order of $G$.
Then $G$ has a subgroup of order $p$.
Proof 1
Lemma
Let $G$ be a finite abelian group whose identity is $e$.
Let $p$ be a prime number which divides the order of $G$.
Then $G$ has a subgroup of order $p$.
Proof of Lemma
Let $\order G$ be a prime number.
Then from Prime Group is Cyclic $G$ has a generator $\gen g$ such that $\order g = p$.
Now suppose $e \ne g \in G$.
Let $\order g = n$.
Let $p \divides n$.
Then by Subgroup of Finite Cyclic Group is Determined by Order the cyclic group $\gen g$ has an element $g$ of order $p$.
Suppose $p \nmid n$.
From Subgroup of Abelian Group is Normal, $\gen g$ is normal in $G$.
Consider the quotient group $G' = \dfrac G {\gen g}$.
As $p \nmid n$, $\gen e \subsetneq \gen g \subsetneq G$.
Thus $\order {G'} < \order G$.
But we have that $p \divides \order G$.
It follows by induction that $G'$ has an element $h'$ of order $p$.
Let $h$ be a preimage of $h'$ under the quotient epimorphism $\phi: G \to G'$.
Then:
- $\paren {h'}^p = e'$
where $e'$ is the identity of $G'$.
Thus $h^p \in \gen g$ so $\paren {h^p}^n = \paren {h^n}^p = e$.
Thus either $h^n$ has order $p$ or $h^n = e$.
If $h^n = e$ then $\paren {h'}^n = e'$.
But since $p$ is the order of $h'$ it would follow that $p \divides n$, contrary to assumption.
$\Box$
This article needs to be tidied. Please fix formatting and $\LaTeX$ errors and inconsistencies. It may also need to be brought up to our standard house style. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Tidy}} from the code. |
This article needs to be linked to other articles. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by adding these links. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{MissingLinks}} from the code. |
We prove the theorem by induction on the order $\order G$.
The first few cases $\order G = 1,2,3$ are obvious. For the induction step, start with the class equation
- $\order G = 1 + \order {C_2} + \cdots + \order {C_r}$
Since $p \divides \order G$, we must have $p \nmid \order {C_j}$ for some $j \geq 2$,
where $C_j$ are conjugacy classes in $G \setminus \set e$.
Let $x \in C_j$,
it follows that $p \divides \order {\map {C_G} x}$,
where $\map {C_G} x$ is the centralizer of $x$ in $G$,
since $\order {C_j} = \frac{\order G}{\order {\map {C_G} x}}$ by Number of Elements in Conjugacy Class Equals the Index of Centralizer.
If $\map {C_G} x \neq G$, then by induction $\map {C_G} x$ contains an element of order $p$, and this element also belongs to $G$.
Otherwise, $\map {C_G} x = G$, which implies that $x \in \map Z G$ (the center of $G$), and by choice $x \neq e$, so $\map Z G \neq \set e$.
Either $p \divides \order {\map Z G}$ or $p \nmid \order {\map Z G}$.
In the first case the proof reduces to lemma (the abelian case).
In the second case, by induction hypothesis to the quotient group $G / \map Z G$, there exists $x \in G$ such that the image $\bar{x} \in G / \map Z G$ has order $p$,
That is, $x^p \in \map Z G$ but $x \notin \map Z G$.
Let $X$ be the cyclic group generated by $x$.
Now the product $X \map Z G$ is abelian and has order divisible by $p$, so by lemma (the abelian case) it has an element of order $p$, and again this element also belongs to $G$.
This completes the induction step, and with it the proof.
$\blacksquare$
Proof 2
This result follows as a special case of Group has Subgroups of All Prime Power Factors.
$\blacksquare$
Also known as
Cauchy's Group Theorem is also seen referred to as Cauchy's Theorem, but as there are several theorems named so, this is not endorsed by $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$.
Source of Name
This entry was named for Augustin Louis Cauchy.
Historical Note
Cauchy's Group Theorem was proved by Augustin Louis Cauchy in $1845$.
Sources
- 1998: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Cauchy, Augustin Louis, Baron (1789-1857)
- 2004: Ian Stewart: Galois Theory (3rd ed.): Chapter $14$ Solubility and Simplicity: $\S3$ Cauchy's Theorem: Theorem $14.15$
- 2008: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Cauchy, Augustin Louis, Baron (1789-1857)
- 2014: Christopher Clapham and James Nicholson: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics (5th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Cauchy's Theorem
- 2021: Richard Earl and James Nicholson: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics (6th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Cauchy's Theorem (group theory)