# Cayley's Representation Theorem

*This proof is about Cayley's Representation Theorem on the subject of finite groups. For other uses, see Cayley's Theorem.*

## Contents

## Theorem

Let $S_n$ denote the symmetric group on $n$ letters.

Every finite group is isomorphic to a subgroup of $S_n$ for some $n \in \Z$.

### General Case

Let $\struct {G, \cdot}$ be a group.

Then there exists a permutation group $P$ on some set $S$ such that:

- $G \cong P$

That is, such that $G$ is isomorphic to $P$.

## Proof 1

Let $H = \set e$.

We can apply Permutation of Cosets to $H$ so that:

- $\mathbb S = G$

and:

- $\map \ker \theta = \set e$

The result follows by the First Isomorphism Theorem for Groups.

$\blacksquare$

## Proof 2

Let $G$ be any arbitrary finite group whose identity is $e_G$.

Let $S$ be the symmetric group on the elements of $G$, where $e_S$ is the identity of $S$.

For any $x \in G$, let $\lambda_x$ be the left regular representation of $G$ with respect to $x$.

From Regular Representations in Group are Permutations, $\forall x \in G: \lambda_x \in S$.

So, we can define a mapping $\theta: G \to S$ as:

- $\forall x \in G: \map \theta x = \lambda_x$

From Composition of Regular Representations, we have:

- $\forall x, y \in G: \lambda_x \circ \lambda_y = \lambda_{x y}$

where in this context $\circ$ denotes composition of mappings.

Thus by definition of $\theta$:

- $\map \theta x \circ \map \theta y = \map \theta {x y}$

demonstrating that $\theta$ is a homomorphism.

Having established that fact, we can now consider $\map \ker \theta$, where $\ker$ denotes the kernel of $\theta$.

Let $x \in G$.

We have that:

\(\displaystyle x\) | \(\in\) | \(\displaystyle \map \ker \theta\) | |||||||||||

\(\displaystyle \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\displaystyle \map \theta x\) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle e_S\) | Definition of Kernel of Group Homomorphism | |||||||||

\(\displaystyle \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\displaystyle \lambda_x\) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle I_G\) | where $I_G$ is the identity mapping of $G$ | |||||||||

\(\displaystyle \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\displaystyle \map {\lambda_x} {e_G}\) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \map {I_G} {e_G}\) | Definition of Identity Mapping | |||||||||

\(\displaystyle \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\displaystyle x\) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle e_G\) | Definitions of $\lambda_x$ and $I_G$ |

So $\map \ker \theta$ can contain no element other than $e_G$.

So, since clearly $e_G \in \map \ker \theta$, it follows that:

- $\map \ker \theta = \set {e_G}$

By Kernel is Trivial iff Monomorphism, it follows that $\theta$ is a monomorphism.

By Monomorphism Image is Isomorphic to Domain, we have that:

- $\theta \sqbrk G \cong \Img \theta$

that is, $\theta$ is isomorphic to its image.

Hence the result.

$\blacksquare$

## Also known as

**Cayley's Representation Theorem** is also known as the **Representation Theorem for Groups**.

Some sources refer to it as just **Cayley's theorem**, but as there is more than one result so named, it is better to use the more specific form.

## Also see

What this theorem tells us is that in order to study finite groups, it is necessary only to study subgroups of the symmetric groups on $n$ letters.

## Source of Name

This entry was named for Arthur Cayley.

## Sources

- 1967: George McCarty:
*Topology: An Introduction with Application to Topological Groups*... (previous) ... (next): $\text{II}$: Problem $\text{EE}$ - 1971: Allan Clark:
*Elements of Abstract Algebra*... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $2$: The Symmetric Groups: $\S 77 \alpha$ - 2008: David Nelson:
*The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics*(4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Entry:**Cayley's theorem** - 2014: Christopher Clapham and James Nicholson:
*The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics*(5th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Entry:**Cayley's Representation Theorem**