Convergence of Generalized Sum of Complex Numbers

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Theorem

Let $\family {z_j}_{j \mathop \in I}$ be an $I$-indexed family of complex numbers.

That is, let $z_j \in \C$ for all $j \in I$.


Let $\map \Re {z_j}$ and $\map \Im {z_j}$ denote the families of real and imaginary parts of the family $z_j$.


Then the following are equivalent:

$(1): \quad \ds \sum_{j \mathop \in I} z_j$ converges to $z \in \C$
$(2): \quad \ds \sum_{j \mathop \in I} \map \Re {z_j}, \sum_{j \mathop \in I} \map \Im {z_j}$ converge to $\map \Re z, \map \Im z \in \R$, respectively


Corollary

Suppose that $\ds \sum_{j \mathop \in I} z_j$ converges to $z \in \C$.


Then $\ds \sum_{j \mathop \in I} \overline {z_j}$ converges to $\overline z$, where $\overline z$ denotes the complex conjugate of $z$.


Proof

$(2)$ implies $(1)$

By Generalized Sum is Linear, the stated convergences lead to:

\(\ds z\) \(=\) \(\ds \map \Re z + i \map \Im z\) Definition of Real Part and Definition of Imaginary Part
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \sum_{j \mathop \in I} \map \Re {z_j} + i \sum_{j \mathop \in I} \map \Im {z_j}\) Statement $(2)$
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \sum_{j \mathop \in I} \paren {\map \Re {z_j} + i \map \Im {z_j} }\) Generalized Sum is Linear
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \sum_{j \mathop \in I} z_j\) Definition of Real Part and Definition of Imaginary Part

$\Box$


$(1)$ implies $(2)$

Statement $(1)$, according to the definition of convergence, amounts to the following:

For every $\epsilon > 0$, there exists a finite $G \subseteq I$ such that:

For every finite $F \subseteq I$ with $G \subseteq F$:
$\ds \cmod {z - \sum_{j \mathop \in F} z_j} < \epsilon$


Now suppose that for $\epsilon > 0$, $G$ and $F$ are as above. Then observe that:

\(\ds \epsilon^2\) \(>\) \(\ds \cmod {z - \sum_{j \mathop \in F} z_j}^2\)
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \paren {\map \Re z - \sum_{j \mathop \in F} \map \Re {z_j} }^2 + \paren {\map \Im z - \sum_{j \mathop \in F} \map \Im {z_j} }^2\) Definition of Modulus of Complex Number

Hence, by Square of Real Number is Non-Negative, both of the terms on the right hand side are smaller than $\epsilon^2$.

It follows that, taking square roots, $G$ satisfies, for any finite $F \supseteq G$:

$\ds \size {\map \Re z - \sum_{j \mathop \in F} \map \Re {z_j} } < \epsilon$
$\ds \size {\map \Im z - \sum_{j \mathop \in F} \map \Im {z_j} } < \epsilon$


As $\epsilon > 0$ was arbitrary, using the definition of convergence, this implies precisely that:

$\ds \sum_{j \mathop \in I} \map \Re {z_j}, \sum_{j \mathop \in I} \map \Im {z_j}$ converge to $\map \Re z, \map \Im z \in \R$, respectively.

Hence, $(1)$ is shown to imply $(2)$.

$\blacksquare$


Also see