Definition:Logical Implication/Distinction with Conditional
< Definition:Logical Implication(Redirected from Definition:Distinction between Logical Implication and Conditional)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Distinction between Logical Implication and Conditional
It is important to understand the difference between:
and:
When $A$ is indeed true, the distinction is less important than when the truth of $A$ is in question, but it is a bad idea to ignore it.
Compare the following:
\(\text {(1)}: \quad\) | \(\ds x > y\) | \(\implies\) | \(\ds \paren {x^2 > x y \text { and } x y > y ^2}\) | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(\implies\) | \(\ds x^2 > y^2\) |
\(\text {(2)}: \quad\) | \(\ds x\) | \(>\) | \(\ds y\) | |||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds x^2\) | \(>\) | \(\ds x y\) | |||||||||||
\(\, \ds \text { and } \, \) | \(\ds x y\) | \(>\) | \(\ds y^2\) | |||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds x^2\) | \(>\) | \(\ds y^2\) |
We note that $(1)$ is a conditional statement of the form:
- $A \implies B \implies C$
This can mean either:
- $\paren {A \implies B} \implies C$
or:
- $A \implies \paren {B \implies C}$
instead of what is actually meant:
- $\paren {A \implies B} \text { and } \paren {B \implies C}$
Hence on $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ we commit to using the form $A \leadsto B$ rigorously in our proofs.
The same applies to $\iff$ and $\leadstoandfrom$ for the same reasons.
Note that there are many pages on $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ using the $\implies$ construct, which are still in the process of being amended to use the $\leadsto$ construct as they should.
Sources
- 1982: P.M. Cohn: Algebra Volume 1 (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: Sets and mappings: $\S 1.1$: The need for logic