Definition:Inverse Relation
Definition
Let $\RR \subseteq S \times T$ be a relation.
The inverse relation to (or of) $\RR$ is defined as:
- $\RR^{-1} := \set {\tuple {t, s}: \tuple {s, t} \in \RR}$
That is, $\RR^{-1} \subseteq T \times S$ is the relation which satisfies:
- $\forall s \in S: \forall t \in T: \tuple {t, s} \in \RR^{-1} \iff \tuple {s, t} \in \RR$
Class Theoretical Definition
In the context of class theory, the definition follows the same lines:
Let $V$ be a basic universe.
Let $A$ and $B$ be subclasses of $V$.
Let $\RR \subseteq A \times B$ be a relation on $A \times B$.
The inverse relation to (or of) $\RR$ is defined as the class of all ordered pairs $\tuple {b, a}$ such that $\tuple {a, b} \in \RR$:
- $\RR^{-1} := \set {\tuple {b, a}: \tuple {a, b} \in \RR}$
Examples
Divisor
Let $\Z_{>0}$ denote the set of (strictly) positive integers.
Let $\RR$ denote the relation on $\Z_{>0}$ defined as:
- $\forall a, b \in \Z_{>0}: \tuple {a, b} \in \RR \iff a \divides b$
where $a \divides b$ denotes that $a$ is a divisor of $b$.
The inverse relation of $\RR$ is defined as:
- $\forall a, b \in \Z_{>0}: \tuple {a, b} \in \RR^{-1} \iff b \divides a$
That is, if and only if $a$ is a multiple of $b$.
Also known as
An inverse relation is also seen as converse relation.
In the context of orderings, the term dual ordering can also be seen.
However, do not confuse this with a dual relation.
Some sources use the notation $\RR^t$, for example T.S. Blyth: Set Theory and Abstract Algebra.
Others use $\breve \RR$, for example Alfred Tarski: Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of Deductive Sciences (2nd ed.) and 1940: Garrett Birkhoff: Lattice Theory.
Still others use $\RR^\gets$, for example Seth Warner: Modern Algebra.
Also see
- Definition:Dual Ordering: the inverse of an ordering.
- Results about inverse relations can be found here.
Sources
- 1955: John L. Kelley: General Topology ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $0$: Relations
- 1960: Paul R. Halmos: Naive Set Theory ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 10$: Inverses and Composites
- 1964: Steven A. Gaal: Point Set Topology ... (previous) ... (next): Introduction to Set Theory: $1$. Elementary Operations on Sets
- 1965: Seth Warner: Modern Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text I$: Algebraic Structures: $\S 5$: Composites and Inverses of Functions: Exercise $5.8$
- 1965: Seth Warner: Modern Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text {III}$: The Natural Numbers: $\S 14$: Orderings
- 1967: Garrett Birkhoff: Lattice Theory (3rd ed.): $\S \text I.2$
- 1967: George McCarty: Topology: An Introduction with Application to Topological Groups ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text{I}$: Sets and Functions: Problem $\text{AA}$: Relations
- 1971: Robert H. Kasriel: Undergraduate Topology ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1.11$: Relations: Definition $11.4$
- 1971: Gaisi Takeuti and Wilson M. Zaring: Introduction to Axiomatic Set Theory: $\S 6.3$
- 1975: T.S. Blyth: Set Theory and Abstract Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 4$. Relations; functional relations; mappings: Exercise $4$
- 1998: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): inverse: 4. (of a relation)
- 1998: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): relation: 1.
- 2000: James R. Munkres: Topology (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $1$: Set Theory and Logic: $\S 3$: Relations: Exercise $3.14$
- 2008: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): inverse: 4. (of a relation)
- 2008: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): relation: 1.