Definition talk:Dual Relation

We've had this discussion on a different page (or at least I raised it and nobody noticed it): when you have definitions defined by description, does it make sense to present the subpage headings as the description rather than as number? One of the contributors likes changing the order of subpages so that his contributions go at the top, and when they're numbered that makes the operation tedious for him (and also adds the danger that other pages which link to these individual subpages then suddenly refer to the wrong page).

Using the descriptions in whatever pages invoke them makes equal sense - then if the above atrocity were to happen, the presented titles in the links refer to the appropriate subpage directly, without needing to rename. --prime mover (talk) 06:30, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Fine with me; but the liberty to use numbers when this is deemed more appropriate should be retained. — Lord_Farin (talk) 09:51, 8 March 2013 (UTC)