# Definition talk:Join Semilattice

The carefully crafted site philosophy appears to be in your head and PM's. I have yet to divine the principles behind it despite having looked at many pages. The fact that you can get to $(S, \vee, \preceq)$ from either $(S, \vee)$ or $(S, \preceq)$ seems central to the concept here. How would you prefer to see that expressed? --Dfeuer (talk) 00:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
As a final suggestion, until you've got sufficiently dirty hands with changing approaches, it may be good to limit your calls for things to be changed. Not that you should ignore the itch that something could be done better, but simply make it better dosed (so that things can be assessed and, if approved, executed properly). You could use the proposed listing also for things that you have observed but haven't come round to suggesting changes for (or even for things you don't see a fix for). Unlike the impression you may have gotten, we're actually hoping that you will come to understand site philosophy fully and be a valued team member, so that we can do away with all the verbose arguments and accusations, and rather work on $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ with unified vision (at least globally, we don't have to agree on everything, of course). That's really what I hope for.