Definition talk:Short Exact Sequence of Modules

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Reverted to the original version, as it is more educational

Not educational. This isn't an understandable exposition. When a short exact sequence is considered, then there is no associated long exact sequence. --Usagiop (talk) 01:40, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

sequence $(1)$ is quite confusing. We are not talking about a sequence but an exact sequence. The latter must be linked at least. --Usagiop (talk) 01:48, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
The exact sequence was in fact linked but the exposition is weird. I am also tired. --Usagiop (talk) 01:55, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

The definitions and formulations here are indeed sketchy. To avoid idiosyncrasy, let us follow the standard route and work from a source (or even better, multiple). — Lord_Farin (talk) 10:24, 5 November 2022 (UTC)