Divisor Relation is Antisymmetric/Corollary
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Corollary to Divisor Relation is Antisymmetric
Let $a, b \in \Z$.
If $a \divides b$ and $b \divides a$ then $a = b$ or $a = -b$.
Proof 1
Let $a \divides b$ and $b \divides a$.
Then from Divisor Relation is Antisymmetric:
- $\size a = \size b$
The result follows from Integer Divides its Negative and Integer Divides its Absolute Value.
$\blacksquare$
Proof 2
Let $a \divides b$ and $b \divides a$.
Then by definition of divisor:
- $\exists c, d \in \Z: a c = b, b d = a$
Thus:
\(\ds a c d\) | \(=\) | \(\ds a\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds c d\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 1\) | |||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds d\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \pm 1\) | Divisors of One | ||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds a\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \pm b\) | as $a = b d$ |
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1980: David M. Burton: Elementary Number Theory (revised ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $2$: Divisibility Theory in the Integers: $2.2$ The Greatest Common Divisor: Theorem $2 \text{-} 2 \ (5)$
- 1982: P.M. Cohn: Algebra Volume 1 (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $2$: Integers and natural numbers: $\S 2.2$: Divisibility and factorization in $\mathbf Z$: $\mathbf D. \, 3$