Equality of Ordered Pairs/Necessary Condition/Proof from Wiener Formalization
Theorem
Let $\tuple {a, b}$ and $\tuple {c, d}$ be ordered pairs such that $\tuple {a, b} = \tuple {c, d}$.
Then $a = c$ and $b = d$.
Proof
First a lemma:
Let $\set {a, b}$ and $\set {a, d}$ be doubletons such that $\set {a, b} = \set {a, d}$.
Then:
- $b = d$
$\Box$
Let $\tuple {a, b} = \tuple {c, d}$.
From the Wiener formalization:
- $\set {\set {\O, \set a}, \set {\set b} } = \set {\set {\O, \set c}, \set {\set d} }$
Let $x \in \set {\set {\O, \set a}, \set {\set b} }$.
Then either:
- $x = \set {\O, \set a}$
or:
- $x = \set {\set b}$
First suppose $x = \set {\O, \set a}$.
Then:
- $x = \set {\O, \set c}$ or $x = \set {\set d}$
Aiming for a contradiction, suppose $x = \set {\set d}$.
That is:
- $\set {\O, \set a} = \set {\set d}$
Then:
- $\set d = \set a$
and also:
- $\set d = \O$
But that means:
- $a \in \O$
which contradicts the definition of the empty set $\O$.
It follows by Proof by Contradiction that $x \ne \set {\set d}$.
Thus $x = \set {\O, \set c}$.
We have that:
- $x = \set {\O, \set a}$ and $x = \set {\O, \set c}$
and so:
- $\set {\O, \set a} = \set {\O, \set c}$
It follows from the lemma that:
- $\set a = \set c$
Hence from Singleton Equality:
- $a = c$
Now suppose $x = \set {\set b}$.
Then:
- $x = \set {\O, \set c}$ or $x = \set {\set d}$
Aiming for a contradiction, suppose $x = \set {\O, \set c}$.
That is:
- $\set {\set b} = \set {\O, \set c}$
which means that $\set b = \O$ and $\set b = \set c$.
But as $\O \ne \set \O$ it follows by Proof by Contradiction that $x \ne \set {\O, \set c}$.
Thus $x = \set {\set d}$.
We have that:
- $x = \set {\set b}$ and $x = \set {\set d}$
- $\set b = \set d$
and again by Singleton Equality:
- $b = d$
$\blacksquare$
![]() | This article needs proofreading. Please check it for mathematical errors. If you believe there are none, please remove {{Proofread}} from the code.To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Proofread}} from the code. |
Sources
- 2010: Raymond M. Smullyan and Melvin Fitting: Set Theory and the Continuum Problem (revised ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $2$: Some Basics of Class-Set Theory: $\S 4$ The pairing axiom: Exercise $4.1. \ \text{(b)}$