Equivalence of Definitions of Minimal Element

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Theorem

Let $\struct {S, \RR}$ be a relational structure.

Let $T \subseteq S$ be a subset of $S$.


The following definitions of the concept of Minimal Element are equivalent:

Definition 1

An element $x \in T$ is a minimal element (under $\RR$) of $T$ if and only if:

$\forall y \in T: y \mathrel \RR x \implies x = y$

Definition 2

An element $x \in T$ is a minimal element (under $\RR$) of $T$ if and only if:

$\neg \exists y \in T: y \mathrel {\RR^\ne} x$

where $y \mathrel {\RR^\ne} x$ denotes that $y \mathrel \RR x$ but $y \ne x$.


Proof

Definition 1 implies Definition 2

Let $x$ be an minimal element by definition 1.

That is:

$(1): \quad \forall y \in T: y \mathrel \RR x \implies x = y$

Aiming for a contradiction, suppose:

$\exists y \in T: y \mathrel {\RR^\ne} x$

Then by definition:

$y \mathrel \RR x \land x \ne y$

which contradicts $(1)$.

Thus by Proof by Contradiction:

$\nexists y \in T: y \mathrel {\RR^\ne} x$

That is $x$ is a minimal element by definition 2.

$\Box$


Definition 2 implies Definition 1

Let $x$ be a minimal element by definition 2.

That is:

$(2): \quad \nexists y \in T: y \mathrel {\RR^\ne} x$

Aiming for a contradiction, suppose:

$\exists y \in T: y \mathrel \RR x: x \ne y$

That is:

$\exists y \in T: y \mathrel {\RR^\ne} x$

which contradicts $(2)$.

Thus:

$\forall y \in T: y \mathrel \RR x \implies x = y$

Thus $x$ is a minimal element by definition 1.

$\blacksquare$


Sources

Retrieved from "https://proofwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Minimal_Element&oldid=518366"