Equivalence of Definitions of Weierstrass E-Function

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


This article needs to be tidied.
Please fix formatting and $\LaTeX$ errors and inconsistencies. It may also need to be brought up to our standard house style.
To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page.
When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Tidy}} from the code.



This article needs to be linked to other articles.
You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by adding these links.
To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page.
When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{MissingLinks}} from the code.


Theorem

Let $\mathbf y, \mathbf z, \mathbf w$ be $n$-dimensional vectors.

Let $\mathbf y$ be such that $\map{\mathbf y} a=A$ and $\map{\mathbf y} b=B$.

Let $J$ be a functional such that:

$\ds J \sqbrk {\mathbf y} = \int_a^b \map F {x, \mathbf y, \mathbf y'} \rd x$

The following definitions of the concept of Weierstrass E-Function are equivalent:

Definition 1

The following mapping is known as the Weierstrass E-Function of $J \sqbrk {\mathbf y}$:

$\map E {x, \mathbf y, \mathbf z, \mathbf w} = \map F {x, \mathbf y, \mathbf w} - \map F {x, \mathbf y, \mathbf z} + \paren {\mathbf w - \mathbf z} F_{\mathbf y'} \paren {x, \mathbf y, \mathbf z}$

Definition 2

Let $\theta \in \R: 0 < \theta < 1$.


The following mapping is known as the Weierstrass E-Function of $J \sqbrk {\mathbf y}$:

$\ds \map E {x, \mathbf y, \mathbf z, \mathbf w} = \frac 1 2 \sum_{i, k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {w_i - z_i} \paren {w_k - z_k} F_{y_i' y_k'} \paren {x, \mathbf y, \mathbf z + \theta \paren {\mathbf w - \mathbf z} }$


Proof

Definition 1 implies Definition 2

By Definition 1:

$\map E {x, \mathbf y, \mathbf z, \mathbf w} = \map F {x, \mathbf y, \mathbf w} - \map F {x, \mathbf y, \mathbf z} + \paren {\mathbf w - \mathbf z} \map {F_{\mathbf y'} } {x, \mathbf y, \mathbf z}$

By Taylor's Theorem, where expansion is done around $\mathbf w = \mathbf z$ and Lagrange form of remainder is used:

$\ds \map F {x, \mathbf y, \mathbf w} = \map F {x, \mathbf y, \mathbf z} + \frac {\partial \map F {x, \mathbf y, \mathbf z} } {\partial \mathbf y'} \paren {\mathbf w - \mathbf z} + \frac 1 2 \sum_{i, j \mathop = 1}^n \paren {w_i - z_i} \paren {w_j - z_j} \frac {\partial^2 \map F {x, \mathbf y, \mathbf z + \theta \paren {\mathbf z - \mathbf w} } } {\partial y_i'y_j'}$

where $\theta \in \R: 0 < \theta < 1$.

Insertion of this expansion into the definition for Weierstrass E-Function leads to the desired result.


$\Box$

Definition 2 implies Definition 1


This theorem requires a proof.
You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by crafting such a proof.
To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page.
When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{ProofWanted}} from the code.
If you would welcome a second opinion as to whether your work is correct, add a call to {{Proofread}} the page.


Sources

Retrieved from "https://proofwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Weierstrass_E-Function&oldid=496514"