Expansion of Included Set Topology
Theorem
Let $S$ be a set.
Let $A_1 \subseteq S$ and $A_2 \subseteq S$.
Let $T_1 = \struct {S, \tau_{A_1} }$ and $T_2 = \struct {S, \tau_{A_2} }$ be included set spaces on $S$.
Then:
- $(1): \quad T_1 \ge T_2 \iff A_1 \subseteq A_2$
- $(2): \quad T_1 > T_2 \iff A_1 \subsetneq A_2$
where:
- $T_1 \ge T_2$ denotes that $T_1$ is finer than $T_2$
- $T_1 > T_2$ denotes that $T_1$ is strictly finer than $T_2$.
Proof
Let $T_1 = \struct {S, \tau_{A_1} }$ and $T_2 = \struct {S, \tau_{A_2} }$ be included set spaces on $S$.
Necessary Condition
Let $T_1 \ge T_2$.
We have that $A_2 \in \tau_{A_2}$ by definition of included set topology.
But by definition of finer topology, $A_2 \in \tau_{A_1}$.
So by definition of included set topology, $A_1 \subseteq A_2$.
Now suppose that $T_1 > T_2$.
That is, $T_1 \ge T_2$ and $T_1 \ne T_2$.
It follows that $\exists X \in \tau_{A_1}: X \notin \tau_{A_2}$.
Then $A_1 \subseteq X \subsetneq A_2$ from which it follows that $A_1 \subsetneq A_2$.
$\Box$
Sufficient Condition
Let $A_1 \subseteq A_2$.
Then:
\(\ds U\) | \(\in\) | \(\ds \tau_{A_2}\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds A_2\) | \(\subseteq\) | \(\ds U\) | Definition of Included Set Topology | ||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds A_1\) | \(\subseteq\) | \(\ds U\) | Subset Relation is Transitive | ||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds U\) | \(\in\) | \(\ds \tau_{A_1}\) | Definition of Included Set Topology |
So $T_1 \ge T_2$ by definition of finer topology.
Now suppose that $A_1 \subsetneq A_2$.
Then $A_2 \nsubseteq A_1$ and so $A_1 \notin \tau_{A_2}$.
Thus $\tau_{A_1} \nsubseteq \tau_{A_2}$ and so $T_1 > T_2$.
$\Box$
Both necessity and sufficiency have been proved, hence the result.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1964: Steven A. Gaal: Point Set Topology ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text {I}$: Topological Spaces: $1$. Open Sets and Closed Sets: Exercise $1 \ \text{(a)}$