Expression for Integer as Product of Primes is Unique/Proof 3
Theorem
Let $n$ be an integer such that $n > 1$.
Then the expression for $n$ as the product of one or more primes is unique up to the order in which they appear.
Proof
The proof proceeds by strong induction.
For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 2}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition:
- the prime decomposition for $n$ is unique up to order of presentation.
Note that it has been established in Integer is Expressible as Product of Primes that $n$ does in fact have at least $1$ prime decomposition.
Basis for the Induction
$\map P 2$ is the case:
- $n = 2$
which is trivially unique.
Thus $\map P 2$ is seen to hold.
This is the basis for the induction.
Induction Hypothesis
Now it needs to be shown that, if $\map P j$ is true, for all $j$ such that $0 \le j \le k$, then it logically follows that $\map P {k + 1}$ is true.
This is the induction hypothesis:
- the prime decomposition for all $j$ such that $0 \le j \le k$ is unique up to order of presentation.
from which it is to be shown that:
- the prime decomposition for $k + 1$ is unique up to order of presentation.
Induction Step
Either $k + 1$ is prime or it is composite.
If $k + 1$ is prime, there is only one way to express it, that is, as the prime $k + 1$ itself.
So suppose $k + 1$ is composite.
Aiming for a contradiction, suppose $k + 1$ has the two prime decompositions:
$k + 1 = p_1 p_2 \dotsm p_r = q_1 q_2 \dotsm q_s$
where:
- $p_1 \le p_2 \le \dotsb \le p_r$
and:
- $q_1 \le q_2 \le \dotsb \le q_s$
Because $q_1$ is a divisor of $k + 1$:
- $q_1 \divides p_1 \le p_2 \le \dotsb \le p_r$
where $\divides$ indicates divisibility.
Thus by Euclid's Lemma for Prime Divisors:
- $\exists p_i \in \set {p_1, p_2, \ldots, p_r}: q_1 \divides p_i$
But as $q_1$ and $p_i$ are both primes, it follows by definition that $q_1 = p_i$.
In a similar way it can be shown that:
- $\exists q_j \in \set {q_1, q_2, \ldots, q_s}: p_1 = q_j$
So we have:
- $p_1 = q_j \ge q_1$
and:
- $q_1 = p_i \ge p_1$
Thus:
- $p_1 \ge q_1 \ge p_1$
and so:
- $p_1 = q_1$
Thus $\dfrac {k + 1} {p_1}$ is an integer such that:
- $\dfrac {k + 1} {p_1} \le k$
and so:
- $p_2 p_3 \dotsm p_r \dfrac {k + 1} {p_1} = q_2 q_3 \dotsm q_s$
But by the induction hypothesis:
- $p_2 = q_2, p_3 = q_3, \dotsc, p_r = q_s$
where furthermore $r = s$.
Therefore the prime decomposition for $k + 1$ is unique.
So $\map P k \implies \map P {k + 1}$ and the result follows by the Second Principle of Mathematical Induction:
- $\forall n \in \Z_{\ge 2}$, the prime decomposition for $n$ is unique up to order of presentation.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1971: George E. Andrews: Number Theory ... (previous) ... (next): $\text {2-4}$ The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic: Theorem $\text {2-5}$