Factor Principles/Disjunction on Right/Formulation 1/Proof 2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
- $p \implies q \vdash \paren {p \lor r} \implies \paren {q \lor r}$
Proof
By the tableau method of natural deduction:
Line | Pool | Formula | Rule | Depends upon | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | $p \implies q$ | Premise | (None) | ||
2 | 2 | $p \lor r$ | Assumption | (None) | ||
3 | 3 | $r$ | Assumption | (None) | ||
4 | 3 | $q \lor r$ | Rule of Addition: $\lor \II_2$ | 3 | ||
5 | 5 | $p$ | Assumption | (None) | ||
6 | 1, 5 | $q$ | Modus Ponendo Ponens: $\implies \mathcal E$ | 1, 5 | ||
7 | 1, 5 | $q \lor r$ | Rule of Addition: $\lor \II_1$ | 6 | ||
8 | 1, 2 | $q \lor r$ | Proof by Cases: $\text{PBC}$ | 2, 5 – 7, 3 – 4 | Assumptions 5 and 3 have been discharged | |
9 | 1 | $\paren {p \lor r} \implies \paren {q \lor r}$ | Rule of Implication: $\implies \II$ | 2 – 8 | Assumption 2 has been discharged |
$\blacksquare$