Linear Transformation is Isomorphism iff Inverse Equals Adjoint
Theorem
Let $\struct {\HH, \innerprod \cdot \cdot_\HH}$ and $\struct {\KK, \innerprod \cdot \cdot_\KK}$ be Hilbert spaces.
Let $U : \HH \to \KK$ be a bounded linear transformation.
Then the following are equivalent:
- $(1): \quad U$ is an isomorphism
- $(2): \quad U$ is invertible and $U^{-1} = U^*$, where $U^*$ denotes the adjoint of $U$.
Proof
$(1)$ implies $(2)$
Suppose that:
- $U$ is an isomorphism.
That is:
- $\innerprod {U g} {U h}_\KK = \innerprod g h_\HH$
for each $g, h \in \HH$.
Let $g, h \in \HH$.
From the definition of the adjoint, we have:
- $\innerprod g h_\HH = \innerprod g {U^* U h}_\KK$
So, from Inner Product is Sesquilinear, we have:
- $\innerprod g {h - U^* U h}_\HH = 0$
Setting $g = h - U^* U h$, we have:
- $\innerprod {h - U^* U h} {h - U^* U h}_\HH = 0$
So from the positiveness of the inner product, we have:
- $h - U^* U h = 0$
so:
- $h = U^* U h$
for all $h \in \HH$.
So:
- $U^* U = I_\HH$
where $I_\HH$ is the identity map on $\HH$.
From Hilbert Space Isomorphism is Bijection, we have that:
- $U$ is a bijection.
So:
- $U$ is invertible.
Let $U^{-1} : \KK \to \HH$ be the inverse of $U$.
Then, we have:
\(\ds U^{-1}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds I_\HH U^{-1}\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {U^* U} U^{-1}\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds U^* \paren {U U^{-1} }\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds U^*\) |
So:
- $U$ is invertible with $U^{-1} = U^*$.
$\Box$
$(2)$ implies $(1)$
Suppose that:
- $U$ is invertible with $U^{-1} = U^*$.
By the definition of an isomorphism, we aim to show that:
- $\innerprod {U g} {U h}_\KK = \innerprod g h_\HH$
for each $g, h \in \HH$.
Let $g, h \in \HH$.
Then, we have:
\(\ds \innerprod {U g} {U h}_\KK\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \innerprod g {U^* \paren {U h} }_\HH\) | Definition of Adjoint Linear Transformation | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \innerprod g {U^{-1} \paren {U h} }_\HH\) | since $U^* = U^{-1}$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \innerprod g {\paren {U^{-1} U} h}_\HH\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \innerprod g h_\HH\) |
So:
- $U$ is an isomorphism.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1990: John B. Conway: A Course in Functional Analysis (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next) $\text {II}.2.5$