Meet-Continuous and Distributive implies Shift Mapping Preserves Finite Suprema
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
Let $\struct {S, \vee, \wedge, \preceq}$ be a meet-continuous distributive complete lattice.
Let $x \in S$.
Let $f: S \to S$ be a mapping such that
- $\forall y \in S: \map f y = x \wedge y$
Then
Proof
Let $X$ be finite subset of $S$ such that:
- $X$ admits a supremum
By definition of complete lattice:
- $f \sqbrk X$ admits a supremum
We will prove the result by induction on the cardinality of $X$.
Basis Case
- $\forall X \subseteq S: \card X = 0 \implies \map \sup {f \sqbrk X} = \map f {\sup X}$
where:
- $\card X$ denotes the cardinality of $X$
Let $X \subseteq S$ such that:
- $\card X = 0$
- $X = \O$
By definition of image of set:
- $f \sqbrk X = \O$
By definitions of bottom and smallest element:
- $\bot \preceq x$
Thus:
\(\ds \map \sup {f \sqbrk X}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \bot\) | Supremum of Empty Set is Smallest Element | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds x \wedge \bot\) | Preceding iff Meet equals Less Operand | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds x \wedge \sup X\) | Supremum of Empty Set is Smallest Element | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map f {\sup X}\) | Definition of $f$ |
$\Box$
Induction Hypothesis
- $\forall X \subseteq S: \card X = n \implies \map \sup {f \sqbrk X} = \map f {\sup X}$
Induction Step
- $\forall X \subseteq S: \card X = n + 1 \implies \map \sup {f \sqbrk X} = \map f {\sup X}$
Let $X \subseteq S$ such that:
- $\card X = n + 1$
Then $X = \set {x_1, \dots, x_n, x_{n + 1} }$.
Thus:
\(\ds \map \sup {f \sqbrk X}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map \sup {f \sqbrk {\set {x_1, \dots, x_n} \cup \set {x_{n + 1} } } }\) | Union of Unordered Tuples | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map \sup {f \sqbrk {\set {x_1, \dots, x_n} } \cup f \sqbrk {\set {x_{n + 1} } } }\) | Image of Union under Mapping | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map \sup {f \sqbrk {\set {x_1, \dots, x_n} } } \vee \map \sup {f \sqbrk {\set {x_{n + 1} } } }\) | Supremum of Suprema | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map f {\sup \set {x_1, \dots, x_n} } \vee \map \sup {f \sqbrk {\set {x_{n + 1} } } }\) | Induction Hypothesis | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map f {\sup \set {x_1, \dots, x_n} } \vee \sup \set {\map f {x_{n + 1} } }\) | Image of Singleton under Mapping | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map f {\sup \set {x_1, \dots, x_n} } \vee \map f {x_{n + 1} }\) | Supremum of Singleton | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {x \wedge \sup \set {x_1, \dots, x_n} } \vee \paren {x \wedge x_{n + 1} }\) | Definition of $f$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds x \wedge \paren {\sup \set {x_1, \dots, x_n} \vee x_{n + 1} }\) | Definition of Distributive Lattice | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds x \wedge \paren {\sup \set {x_1, \dots, x_n} \vee \sup \set {x_{n + 1} } }\) | Supremum of Singleton | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds x \wedge \sup X\) | Supremum of Suprema | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map f {\sup X}\) | Definition of $f$ |
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1980: G. Gierz, K.H. Hofmann, K. Keimel, J.D. Lawson, M.W. Mislove and D.S. Scott: A Compendium of Continuous Lattices
- Mizar article WAYBEL_2:17