Meet Preserves Directed Suprema/Lemma 2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
Let $\mathscr S = \struct {S, \preceq}$ be an up-complete meet semilattice such that
- $\forall x \in S$, a directed subset $D$ of $S$: $x \preceq \sup D \implies x \preceq \sup \set {x \wedge y: y \in D}$
Let $x$ be an element of $S$, $D$ be a directed subset of $S$.
Then:
- $\paren {\sup D} \wedge x = \sup \set {d \wedge x: d \in D}$
Proof
- $\paren {\sup D} \wedge x \preceq \sup D$
By assumption:
- $\paren {\sup D} \wedge x \preceq \sup \set {\paren {\sup D} \wedge x \wedge d: d \in D}$
By definition of supremum:
- $\forall d \in D: d \preceq \sup D$
By Preceding iff Meet equals Less Operand:
- $\forall d \in D: d \wedge \sup D = d$
By Meet is Associative and Meet is Commutative:
- $\paren {\sup D} \wedge x \preceq \sup \set {d \wedge x: d \in D}$
By Meet Semilattice is Ordered Structure:
- $\forall d \in D: d \wedge x \preceq \paren {\sup D} \wedge x$
By definition:
- $\paren {\sup D} \wedge x$ is upper bound for $\set {d \wedge x: d \in D}$
By definition of supremum:
- $\sup \set {d \wedge x: d \in D} \preceq \paren {\sup D} \wedge x$
if $\set {d \wedge x: d \in D}$ admits a supremum
We will prove that:
- $\set {d \wedge x: d \in D}$ is directed
Let $y, z \in \set {d \wedge x: d \in D}$.
Then
- $\exists d_1 \in D: y = d_1 \wedge x$
and
- $\exists d_2 \in D: z = d_2 \wedge x$
By definition of directed subset:
- $\exists d \in D: d_1 \preceq d \land d_2 \preceq d$
By Meet Semilattice is Ordered Structure:
- $y \preceq d \wedge x$ and $z \preceq d \wedge x$
Thus
- $d \wedge x \in \set {d \wedge x: d \in D}$
Hence by definition:
- $\set {d \wedge x: d \in D}$ is directed.
$\Box$
By definition of up-complete:
- $\set {d \wedge x: d \in D}$ admits a supremum
Thus by definition of antisymmetry:
- $\paren {\sup D} \wedge x = \sup \set {d \wedge x: d \in D}$
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1980: G. Gierz, K.H. Hofmann, K. Keimel, J.D. Lawson, M.W. Mislove and D.S. Scott: A Compendium of Continuous Lattices
- Mizar article WAYBEL_2:28