Meet of Suprema equals Supremum of Meet of Ideals implies Ideal Supremum is Meet Preserving
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
Let $\mathscr S = \struct {S, \wedge, \preceq}$ be an up-complete meet semilattice.
Let $f: \map {\it Ids} {\mathscr S} \to S$ be a mapping such that:
- $\forall I \in \map {\it Ids} {\mathscr S}: \map f I = \sup_{\mathscr S} I$
where
Let
- $\forall I_1, I_2 \in \map {\it Ids} {\mathscr S}: \paren {\sup I_1} \wedge \paren {\sup I_2} = \sup \set {i \wedge j: i \in I_1, j \in I_2}$
Then:
$f$ preserves meet as a mapping from $\struct {\map {\it Ids} {\mathscr S}, \subseteq}$ into $\mathscr S$
Proof
Let $I, J \in \map {\it Ids} {\mathscr S}$ such that
- $\set {I, J}$ admits an infimum in $\struct {\map {\it Ids} {\mathscr S}, \subseteq}$.
By definition of image of set:
- $\map {f^\to} {\set {I, J} } = \set {\map f I, \map f J}$
Thus by definition of meet semilattice:
- $\map {f^\to} {\set {I, J} }$ admits an infimum in $\mathscr S$.
Thus:
\(\ds \map \inf {\map {f^\to} {\set {I, J} } }\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map f I \wedge \map f J\) | Definition of Meet (Order Theory) | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {\sup I} \wedge \paren {\sup J}\) | Definition of $f$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \sup \set {x \wedge y: x \in I, y \in J}\) | Assumption | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map \sup {I \wedge J}\) | Meet in Set of Ideals | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map f {I \wedge J}\) | definition of $f$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map f {\inf \set {I, J} }\) | Definition of Meet (Order Theory) |
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1980: G. Gierz, K.H. Hofmann, K. Keimel, J.D. Lawson, M.W. Mislove and D.S. Scott: A Compendium of Continuous Lattices
- Mizar article WAYBEL_2:39