Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest/Proof
Theorem
Let $N$ be a class which is closed under a progressing mapping $g$.
Let $b$ be an element of $N$ such that $N$ is minimally closed under $g$ with respect to $b$.
For all $x, y \in N$:
- either $\map g x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$
and $N$ forms a nest:
- $\forall x, y \in N: x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$
Proof
Let $\RR$ be the relation on $N$ defined as:
- $\forall x, y \in N: \map \RR {x, y} \iff \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$
We are given that $g$ is a progressing mapping.
From the Progressing Function Lemma, we have that:
\((1)\) | $:$ | \(\ds \forall y \in \Dom g:\) | \(\ds \map \RR {y, \O} \) | ||||||
\((2)\) | $:$ | \(\ds \forall x, y \in \Dom g:\) | \(\ds \map \RR {x, y} \land \map \RR {y, x} \) | \(\ds \implies \) | \(\ds \map \RR {x, \map g y} \) |
In what follows, $(1)$ is not needed.
From the Double Induction Principle for Minimally Closed Class, if $\RR$ is a relation on $N$ which satisfies:
\((\text D_1)\) | $:$ | \(\ds \forall x \in N:\) | \(\ds \map \RR {x, b} \) | ||||||
\((\text D_2)\) | $:$ | \(\ds \forall x, y \in N:\) | \(\ds \map \RR {x, y} \land \map \RR {y, x} \implies \map \RR {x, \map g y} \) |
then $\map \RR {x, y}$ holds for all $x, y \in N$.
As $\Dom g = N$ it is seen that $(\text D 2)$ is fulfilled by $(2)$ directly.
It remains to be demonstrated that $(\text D 1)$ holds.
Indeed, from Smallest Element of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping, we have that:
- $\forall x \in N: b \subseteq x$
By the Rule of Addition:
- $\forall x \in N: \map g x \subseteq b \lor b \subseteq x$
That is:
- $\forall x \in N: \map \RR {x, b}$
Thus by the Double Induction Principle for Minimally Closed Class:
- $\forall x, y \in N: \map \RR {x, y}$
That is:
- $\forall x, y \in N: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$
$\Box$
As $g$ is a progressing mapping, we have:
- $x \subseteq \map g x$
Hence from:
- $\map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$
we have:
- $x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$
Hence the result by definition of a nest.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 2010: Raymond M. Smullyan and Melvin Fitting: Set Theory and the Continuum Problem (revised ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $3$: The Natural Numbers: $\S 4$ A double induction principle and its applications: Exercise $4.1$