Minkowski's Inequality for Sums

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Theorem

Let $a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n, b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n \in \R_{\ge 0}$ be non-negative real numbers.

Let $p \in \R$, $p \ne 0$ be a real number.

If $p < 0$, then we require that $a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n, b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n$ be strictly positive.


If $p > 1$, then:

$\ds \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {a_k + b_k}^p}^{1/p} \le \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n a_k^p}^{1/p} + \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n b_k^p}^{1/p}$


If $p < 1$, $p \ne 0$, then:

$\ds \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {a_k + b_k}^p}^{1/p} \ge \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n a_k^p}^{1/p} + \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n b_k^p}^{1/p}$


Condition for Equality

$\ds \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {a_k + b_k}^p}^{1 / p} = \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n a_k^p}^{1 / p} + \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n b_k^p}^{1 / p}$

holds if and only if, for all $k \in \closedint 1 n$:

$\dfrac {a_k} {b_k} = c$

for some $c \in \R_{>0}$.


Corollary

Let $a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n, b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n \in \R$ be real numbers.

Let $p \in \R$ be a real number.


If $p > 1$, then:

$\ds \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \size {a_k + b_k}^p}^{1/p} \le \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \size {a_k}^p}^{1/p} + \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \size {b_k}^p}^{1/p}$


Proof

Proof for $p = 2$

$p = 2$ is an easily proved special case:

\(\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {a_k + b_k}^2\) \(=\) \(\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {a_k^2 + 2 a_k b_k + b_k^2}\)
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n a_k^2 + 2 \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n a_k b_k + \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n b_k^2\)
\(\ds \) \(\le\) \(\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n a_k^2 + 2 \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n a_k^2}^{1 / 2} \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n b_k^2}^{1 / 2} + \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n b_k^2\) Cauchy's Inequality
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \paren {\paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n a_k^2}^{1 / 2} + \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n b_k^2}^{1 / 2} }^2\)


The result follows from Order is Preserved on Positive Reals by Squaring.

$\Box$


Proof for $p > 1$

Define:

$q = \dfrac p {p - 1}$

Then:

$\dfrac 1 p + \dfrac 1 q = \dfrac 1 p + \dfrac {p - 1} p = 1$


It follows that:

\(\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {a_k + b_k}^p\) \(=\) \(\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n a_k \paren {a_k + b_k}^{p - 1} + \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n b_k \paren {a_k + b_k}^{p - 1}\)
\(\ds \) \(\le\) \(\ds \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n {a_k}^p}^{1 / p} \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {\paren {a_k + b_k}^{p - 1} }^q}^{1 / q} + \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n {b_k}^p}^{1 / p} \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {\paren {a_k + b_k}^{p - 1} }^q}^{1 / q}\) Hölder's Inequality for Sums (twice)
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n {a_k}^p}^{1 / p} \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {a_k + b_k}^p}^{1 / q} + \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n {b_k}^p}^{1 / p} \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {a_k + b_k}^p}^{1 / q}\) Power of Power, and by hypothesis: $\paren {p - 1} q = p$
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \paren {\paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n {a_k}^p}^{1 / p} + \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n {b_k}^p}^{1 / p} } \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {a_k + b_k}^p}^{1 / q}\)
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) \(\ds \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {a_k + b_k}^p}^{1 - 1 / q}\) \(\le\) \(\ds \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n {a_k}^p}^{1 / p} + \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n {b_k}^p}^{1 / p}\) dividing by $\ds \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {a_k + b_k}^p}^{1 / q}$
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) \(\ds \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {a_k + b_k}^p}^{1 / p}\) \(\le\) \(\ds \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n {a_k}^p}^{1 / p} + \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n {b_k}^p}^{1 / p}\) as $1 - \dfrac 1 q = p$

$\Box$


Proof for $p < 1$, $p \ne 0$

In this case, $p$ and $q$ have opposite sign.

The proof then follows the same lines as the proof for $p > 1$, except that the Reverse Hölder's Inequality for Sums is applied instead.

$\blacksquare$


Also known as

Minkowski's Inequality for Sums is also known just as Minkowski's Inequality.

However, this can cause it to be confused with Minkowski's Inequality for Integrals, so will not be used in this context on $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$.


Also see


Source of Name

This entry was named for Hermann Minkowski.


Sources