Nakayama's Lemma/Proof 2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
Let $A$ be a commutative ring with unity.
Let $M$ be a finitely generated $A$-module.
Let $\map {\operatorname{Jac} } A$ be the Jacobson radical of $A$.
Let $\mathfrak a \subseteq \map {\operatorname{Jac} } A$ be an ideal of $A$.
Suppose $\mathfrak a M = M$.
Then:
- $M = 0$
Proof
Let $\phi : M \to M$ be the identity mapping on $M$, i.e.:
- $\forall x \in M : \map \phi x = x$
Since $\mathfrak a M = M$ by hypothesis, $\phi$ is an endomorphism of $M$ such that:
- $\map \phi M \subseteq a M$
By Cayley-Hamilton Theorem, there exist $a_0, \ldots , a_{n-1} \in \mathfrak a$ such that:
- $(1):\quad \phi^n + a_{n - 1} \phi^{n-1} + \cdots + a_1 \phi + a_0 = 0$
Evaluating $(1)$ at $x=1$, especially, we have:
- $(2):\quad 1 + a= 0$
where:
- $a := a_{n - 1} + \cdots + a_1 + a_0$
Since:
- $a \in \mathfrak a \subseteq \map {\operatorname {Jac} } A$
by Characterisation of Jacobson Radical, $1 + a$ is a unit in $A$.
Thus for each $x \in M$, we have:
\(\ds x\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {1 + a}^{-1} \paren {1 + a} x\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {1 + a}^{-1} 0\) | by $(2)$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds 0\) |
That is:
- $M = 0$
$\blacksquare$