Newton's Laws of Motion/Third Law
Contents
Physical Law
Newton's third law of motion is one of three physical laws that forms the basis for classical mechanics.
Statement of Law
- To every force there is always an equal and opposite force. That is, the forces of two bodies on each other are always equal and are directed in opposite directions.
As Isaac Newton himself put it:
- Whenever one body exerts a force on a second body, the second body exerts a force on the first body. These forces are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction.
Proof of third law in the special case of one-dimensional motion
As according to site policy, this section needs to be extracted into its own page, which will then be subject to appraisal for its acceptability on this site, on the grounds of quality, accuracy and relevance.
Until this has been finished, please leave {{refactor}} in the code.
New contributors: Refactoring is a task which is expected to be undertaken by experienced editors only. Because of the underlying complexity of the work needed, it is recommended that you do not embark on a refactoring task until you have become familiar with the structural nature of pages of $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$.
In particular: throughout this section.
You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by adding these links.
To discuss this in more detail, feel free to use the talk page.
Once you have done so, you can remove this instance of {{MissingLinks}} from the code.
It is actually possible to almost prove[1] the third law, provided we restrict the discussion to one dimension, and provided we accept two axioms:
This article contains statements that are justified by handwavery, in particular:
In the same way that this "almost" proves N3L, the Riemann Hypothesis, the Twin Prime Conjecture and Goldbach's Conjecture have likewise "almost" been proved.
You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by adding precise reasons why such statements hold.
If you are able to do this, then when you have done so you can remove this instance of {{Handwaving}} from the code.
If you would welcome a second opinion as to whether your work is correct, add a call to {{Proofread}} the page (see the proofread template for usage).
To discuss this in more detail, feel free to use the talk page.
Axiom 1: Newtonian mechanics applies not only to particles, but to bodies made up of particles in such a way that can be easily understood for a nearly infinite number of connected particles.
This article contains statements that are justified by handwavery, in particular:
can be easily understood for a nearly infinite number of connected particles.
You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by adding precise reasons why such statements hold.
If you are able to do this, then when you have done so you can remove this instance of {{Handwaving}} from the code.
If you would welcome a second opinion as to whether your work is correct, add a call to {{Proofread}} the page (see the proofread template for usage).
To discuss this in more detail, feel free to use the talk page.
This is where the almost comes in: If Newtonian physics is to be useful for entire planets, the forces on these planets need to be understood without understanding all the internal forces between the many, many particles involved. For that reason, the next axiom is almost a corollary to the first axiom:
Axiom 2: When Newton's second law is applied to collections of particles, only external forces need be considered.
Without this second axiom, Newtonian physics would be so complicated that it is virtually useless; planets would go where their internal forces send them.
Consider two bodies $m_1$ and $m_2$ that are held at a fixed distance from each other.
It is assumed that they exert "internal" forces on each other, but we do not assume that these forces are equal and opposite.
There is an unspoken assumption here that "internal" needs to be explained. The preferred expository technique on $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ is always to explain terms by means of links to other pages. Leaving a term in quotes suggests: "Oh, you know what I mean, I can't explain it, but, well, you know what I mean."
You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by explaining it. To discuss this point in more detail, feel free to use the talk page.
If you are able to explain it, then when you have done so you can remove this instance of {{Explain}} from the code.
Let $F_{12}$ be the internal force on $m_1$ by $m_2$.
Let $F_{21}$ be the internal force on $m_2$ by $m_1$.
Let a force $F_{\text{ext} }$ act only on $m_2$.
Since the bodies $m_1$ and $m_2$ are held at a fixed distance from each other, they both have the same velocity $v$ and the same acceleration $a$.
Note that the following three equations hold:
- $(1): \quad F_{\text{ext} } = \left({m_1 + m_2}\right) a$
- $(2): \quad F_{\text{ext} } + F_{21} = m_2 a$
- $(3): \quad F_{12} = m_1 a$
Adding equations $(2)$ and $(3)$ and comparing with equation $(1)$ yields Newton's third law:
- $F_{12} + F_{21} = 0$
$\blacksquare$
Footnotes and References
- ↑ This was submitted to Physics Teacher a few years ago, but was rejected. It is virtually certain that this idea has been put forth somewhere, and a proper reference to it would be appreciated.
Also known as
This law is also referred to as the law of action and reaction.
It is also often referred to as just Newton's third law.
Also see
Source of Name
This entry was named for Isaac Newton.
Sources
- 1937: Eric Temple Bell: Men of Mathematics ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text{VI}$: On the Seashore
- 1966: Isaac Asimov: Understanding Physics: $\text{I}$: Chapter $3$
- 2014: Christopher Clapham and James Nicholson: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics (5th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Entry: Newton's laws of motion
