No 4 Fibonacci Numbers can be in Arithmetic Sequence/Mistake
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Source Work
1986: David Wells: Curious and Interesting Numbers:
- The Dictionary
- $5$
1997: David Wells: Curious and Interesting Numbers (2nd ed.):
- The Dictionary
- $5$
Mistake
- (Incidentally, no four terms of the Fibonacci sequence can be in arithmetic progression.)
The trivial case:
- $F_0 = 0, F_1 = 1, F_3 = 2, F_4 = 3$
has been forgotten.
Sources
- 1986: David Wells: Curious and Interesting Numbers ... (previous) ... (next): $5$
- 1997: David Wells: Curious and Interesting Numbers (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $5$