No 4 Fibonacci Numbers can be in Arithmetic Sequence/Mistake

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Source Work

1986: David Wells: Curious and Interesting Numbers:

The Dictionary
$5$


1997: David Wells: Curious and Interesting Numbers (2nd ed.):

The Dictionary
$5$


Mistake

(Incidentally, no four terms of the Fibonacci sequence can be in arithmetic progression.)


The trivial case:

$F_0 = 0, F_1 = 1, F_3 = 2, F_4 = 3$

has been forgotten.


Sources