Order of Squares in Totally Ordered Ring without Proper Zero Divisors

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Let $\struct {R, +, \circ, \le}$ be a totally ordered ring without proper zero divisors whose zero is $0_R$.

Let $x, y \in R$ be positive, that is, $0_R \le x, y$.

Then $x \le y \iff x \circ x \le y \circ y$.

That is, the square mapping is an order embedding of $\struct {R_{\ge 0}, \le}$ into itself.

When $R$ is one of the standard sets of numbers $\Z, \Q, \R$, then this translates into:

If $x, y$ are positive, then $x \le y \iff x^2 \le y^2$.


From Order of Squares in Ordered Ring, we have:

$x \le y \implies x \circ x \le y \circ y$

To prove the opposite implication, we use a Proof by Contradiction.

Aiming for a contradiction, suppose $x \circ x \le y \circ y$ but $x \not\le y$.

Since $\le$ is a total ordering, this means $y < x$.

Since $0_R \le y$, Extended Transitivity shows that $0_R < x$, so in particular $x ≠ 0_R$.

As $\le$ is compatible with the ring structure $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ and $x$ and $y$ are both positive, we have:

$y \circ y \le y \circ x \le x \circ x$

Since we assume $x \circ x \le y \circ y$, Ordering Cycle implies Equality shows that:

$y \circ y = x \circ x = y \circ x$


\(\ds 0_R\) \(=\) \(\ds x \circ x + \paren {-\paren {y \circ x} }\) Definition of Ring Negative
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds x \circ x + \paren {-y} \circ x\) Product with Ring Negative
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \paren {x + \paren {-y} } \circ x\) Ring Axiom $\text D$: Distributivity of Product over Addition

Since $x \ne y$, we have that $x + \paren {-y} \ne 0_R$; otherwise, by Ring Axiom $\text A1$: Associativity of Addition, we would have $x = \paren {x + \paren {-y} } + y = y$.

We have already shown that $x \ne 0_R$.

But then $x$ and $x + \paren {-y}$ are proper zero divisors of $R$, contradicting the hypothesis that $R$ has no proper zero divisors.


Also see