# P-Norm is Norm/Complex Numbers

This article needs to be linked to other articles.Some of the "obvious" facts about the properties of real and complex numbers are on $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ and could be (should be) linked to.
I would gladly do so, but I can't locate those theorems. Indeed, something as simple as "sum of non-negatives is non-negative" or "sum vanishes iff summands vanish" should be somewhere here, but whatever I throw at the search engine is ineffective. A useful strategy is to put a redlink in place, and then it is clear to anyone doing maintenance that there's work to be done.You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by adding these links.To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page.When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of `{{MissingLinks}}` from the code. |

## Theorem

The $p$-norm on the complex numbers is a norm.

## Proof

Let $K \in \C^d$, where $d \in \N_{> 0}$.

### Norm Axiom $\text N 1$: Positive Definiteness

Suppose $\sequence {x_n}_{n \mathop \in {\N}, \, n \mathop \le d} \in K$.

By definition of $p$-norm:

- $\ds \norm {\mathbf x}_p = \paren {\sum_{n \mathop = 0}^d \size {x_n}^p}^{1/p}$

The complex modulus of $x_n$ is real and non-negative.

We have the results:

- Sum of Non-Negative Reals is Non-Negative
- Power of Positive Real Number is Positive
- Zero Raised to Positive Power is Zero

Hence, $\norm {\mathbf x}_p \ge 0$.

Suppose, $\norm {\mathbf x}_p = 0$.

Then:

\(\ds \norm {\mathbf x}_p\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 0\) | ||||||||||||

\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^d \size {x_n}^p\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 0\) | raising to power $p > 0$ | ||||||||||

\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \size {x_n}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 0\) | Sum of Non-Negatives vanishes iff Summands vanish | ||||||||||

\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds x_n\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 0\) | Complex Modulus equals Zero iff Zero | ||||||||||

\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \bf x\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \sequence 0_{n \mathop \in \N, \, n \mathop \le d}\) |

Thus Norm Axiom $\text N 1$: Positive Definiteness is satisfied.

$\Box$

### Norm Axiom $\text N 2$: Positive Homogeneity

Suppose, $\lambda \in K$.

\(\ds \norm {\lambda \mathbf x}_p\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {\sum_{n \mathop = 0}^d \size {\lambda x_n}^p}^{1/p}\) | ||||||||||||

\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {\size {\lambda}^p \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^d \size {x_n}^p}^{1/p}\) | ||||||||||||

\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \size {\lambda} \paren {\sum_{n \mathop = 0}^d \size {x_n}^p}^{1/p}\) | ||||||||||||

\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \size {\lambda} \norm {\mathbf x}_p\) |

Thus Norm Axiom $\text N 2$: Positive Homogeneity is satisfied.

$\Box$

### Norm Axiom $\text N 3$: Triangle Inequality

If $\mathbf x = \sequence 0$ and $\mathbf y = \sequence 0$, then by Norm Axiom $\text N 1$: Positive Definiteness we have equality.

If $\mathbf x + \mathbf y = \sequence 0$ and both $\bf x$ and $\bf y$ nonvanishing, then by Norm Axiom $\text N 1$: Positive Definiteness we get a strict inequality.

If $\mathbf x + \mathbf y \ne \sequence 0$, then consider p-norm raised to the power of $p$:

\(\ds \norm {\bf x + \bf y}_p^p\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^d \size {x_n + y_n} \size {x_n + y_n}^{p \mathop - 1}\) | ||||||||||||

\(\ds \) | \(\le\) | \(\ds \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^d \size {x_n} \size {x_n + y_n}^{p \mathop - 1} + \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^d \size {y_n} \size {x_n + y_n}^{p \mathop - 1}\) | Triangle Inequality for Complex Numbers | |||||||||||

\(\ds \) | \(\le\) | \(\ds \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^d \size {x_n \paren{x_n + y_n}^{p \mathop - 1} } + \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^d \size {y_n \paren{ x_n + y_n}^{p \mathop - 1} }\) | Modulus of Product | |||||||||||

\(\ds \) | \(\le\) | \(\ds \norm {\bf x}_p \norm {\paren{\mathbf x + \mathbf y}^{p \mathop - 1} }_q + \norm {\mathbf y}_p \norm {\paren{\mathbf x + \mathbf y}^{p \mathop - 1} }_q\) | Hölder's Inequality for Sums: $\dfrac 1 p + \dfrac 1 q = 1$ | |||||||||||

\(\ds \) | \(\le\) | \(\ds \norm {\bf x}_p \norm {\mathbf x + \mathbf y}_p^{p \mathop - 1} + \norm {\mathbf y}_p \norm {\mathbf x + \mathbf y}_p^{p \mathop - 1}\) | Transformation of $p$-Norm: $q \paren {p - 1} = p$ | |||||||||||

\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \norm {\mathbf x + \mathbf y}_p \norm {\mathbf x + \mathbf y}_p^{p \mathop - 1}\) | \(\le\) | \(\ds \norm {\mathbf x}_p \norm {\mathbf x + \mathbf y}_p^{p \mathop - 1} + \norm {\bf y}_p \norm {\bf x + \bf y}_p^{p \mathop - 1}\) | |||||||||||

\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \norm {\bf x + \bf y}_p\) | \(\le\) | \(\ds \norm {\bf x}_p + \norm {\bf y}_p\) | Division by $\norm {\bf x + \bf y}_p^{p \mathop - 1}$ |

Thus Norm Axiom $\text N 3$: Triangle Inequality is satisfied.

$\Box$

All norm axioms are seen to be satisfied.

Hence the result.

$\blacksquare$

## Sources

- 2017: Amol Sasane:
*A Friendly Approach to Functional Analysis*... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1.2$: Normed and Banach spaces. Normed Spaces