# Positive Integer Greater than 1 has Prime Divisor

## Lemma

Every positive integer greater than $1$ has at least one divisor which is prime.

## Proof 1

By the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, every natural number greater than one can be factored into a unique set of prime numbers.

Therefore, every positive integer greater than one has at least one prime factor.

$\blacksquare$

## Proof 2 (not using FTA)

Suppose the contrary, and that there are some positive integers which are not divisible by some prime.

Let $S = \set {n \in \Z: n > 1: \neg \exists p \in \Bbb P: p \divides n}$.

That is:

- $S = \set {\text {all integers not divisible by a prime} }$

Let $n \in S$ be the smallest of these.

As $S$ is bounded below by $1$, this is bound to exist, by Set of Integers Bounded Below by Integer has Smallest Element.

So:

- $\neg \exists x \in S: x < n$

Now $n$ cannot be prime itself:

- $\paren {\paren {n \in \Bbb P} \land \paren {n \divides n} \implies n \notin S} \implies n \notin \Bbb P$

So from Composite Number has Two Divisors Less Than It:

- $\exists r, s \in \Z: n = r s, 1 < r < n, 1 < s< n$

There are two possibilities:

- $(1):\quad$ Neither $r$ nor $s$ has a prime divisor
- $(2):\quad$ At least one of $r$ and $s$ has a prime divisor.

If either $r$ or $s$ has a prime divisor, then:

- $\exists p \in \Bbb P: \paren {p \divides r} \lor \paren {p \divides s} \implies p \divides n$

This contradicts our claim that $n$ is not not divisible by some prime.

However, if neither $r$ nor $s$ has a prime divisor, it follows that $r, s \in S$.

But as $r, s < n$, this contradicts our choice of $n$ as the smallest element of $S$.

Therefore there can be no such $n$, therefore $S = \O$, and all positive integers greater than one are divisible by some prime.

$\blacksquare$

## Sources

- 1971: Allan Clark:
*Elements of Abstract Algebra*... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: Properties of the Natural Numbers: $\S 22 \alpha$