Reduced Residue System/Examples/Modulo 18/Square Numbers

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Examples of Reduced Residue Systems

The set of integers:

$\set {1, 25, 49, 121, 169, 289}$

does not form a reduced residue system modulo $18$.


Proof

We have:

\(\ds 25\) \(=\) \(\ds 1 \times 18 + 7\)
\(\ds \) \(\equiv\) \(\ds 7\) \(\ds \pmod {18}\)
\(\ds 49\) \(=\) \(\ds 2 \times 18 + 13\)
\(\ds \) \(\equiv\) \(\ds 13\) \(\ds \pmod {18}\)
\(\ds 121\) \(=\) \(\ds 6 \times 18 + 13\)
\(\ds \) \(\equiv\) \(\ds 13\) \(\ds \pmod {18}\)
\(\ds 169\) \(=\) \(\ds 9 \times 18 + 7\)
\(\ds \) \(\equiv\) \(\ds 7\) \(\ds \pmod {18}\)
\(\ds 289\) \(=\) \(\ds 16 \times 18 + 1\)
\(\ds \) \(\equiv\) \(\ds 1\) \(\ds \pmod {18}\)

Thus we see that:

$\set {1, 25, 49, 121, 169, 289}$

is equivalent to:

$\set {1, 7, 13}$


While $\set {1, 7, 13}$ are all coprime to $18$, they do not form a least positive reduced residue system modulo $18$, which is:

$\set {1, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17}$

from Least Positive Reduced Residue System Modulo 18.

$\blacksquare$


Sources