Rule of Simplification/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Proof 1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
- $(1): \quad \vdash p \land q \implies p$
- $(2): \quad \vdash p \land q \implies q$
Proof
Form 1
By the tableau method of natural deduction:
Line | Pool | Formula | Rule | Depends upon | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | $p \land q$ | Assumption | (None) | ||
2 | 1 | $p$ | Rule of Simplification: $\land \EE_1$ | 1 | ||
3 | $p \land q \implies p$ | Rule of Implication: $\implies \II$ | 1 – 2 | Assumption 1 has been discharged |
$\blacksquare$
Form 2
By the tableau method of natural deduction:
Line | Pool | Formula | Rule | Depends upon | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | $p \land q$ | Assumption | (None) | ||
2 | 1 | $q$ | Rule of Simplification: $\land \EE_2$ | 1 | ||
3 | $p \land q \implies q$ | Rule of Implication: $\implies \II$ | 1 – 2 | Assumption 1 has been discharged |
$\blacksquare$