Square of Small Repunit is Palindromic/Mistake/First Edition
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Source Work
1986: David Wells: Curious and Interesting Numbers:
- The Dictionary
- $1,111,111,111,111,111,111$
Mistake
- The squares of repunits make a pretty pattern:
- For example: ... $1111111111111^2 = 12345678900987654321$
Correction
That should read:
- $1111111111^2 = 1234567900987654321$
The repunit in question is of index $13$, not $10$, and there is an extra $8$ in its square.
The first of these mistakes has been corrected in Curious and Interesting Numbers, 2nd ed. of $1997$, but not the second.
Sources
- 1986: David Wells: Curious and Interesting Numbers ... (previous) ... (next): $1,111,111,111,111,111,111$