Strictly Increasing Sequence induces Partition
Theorem
Let $\sequence {r_k}_{0 \mathop \le k \mathop \le n}$ be a strictly increasing finite sequence of natural numbers.
Let:
- $\forall k \in \closedint 1 n: A_k := \closedint {r_{k - 1} + 1} {r_k}$
Then:
- $\set {A_k: k \in \closedint 1 n}$ is a partition of $\closedint {r_0 + 1} {r_n}$.
Proof
First we show that the elements of $\set {A_k: k \in \closedint 1 n}$ are disjoint.
Let $j \in \closedint 1 n$.
We have that:
- $\sequence {r_k}_{0 \mathop \le k \mathop \le n}$ is strictly increasing
and:
- $0 \le j - 1 < j \le n$
Thus by Sum with One is Immediate Successor in Naturally Ordered Semigroup:
- $r_0 \le r_{j - 1} < r_j \le r_n \implies \paren {r_0 + 1} \le \paren {r_{j - 1} + 1} \le r_j \le r_n$
So:
- $\O \subset A_j \subseteq \closedint {r_0 + 1} {r_n}$
Because $\sequence {r_k}_{0 \mathop \le k \mathop \le n}$ is strictly increasing:
- $1 \le j < k \le n \implies A_j \cap A_k = \O$
So the elements of $\set {A_k: k \in \closedint 1 n}$ are disjoint, as we were to show.
It remains to be established that:
- if $m \in \closedint {r_0 + 1} {r_n}$
then:
- $m \in A_k$ for some $k \in \closedint 1 n$.
Let $m \in \closedint {r_0 + 1} {r_n}$.
Consider the set:
- $J = \set {j \in \closedint 0 n: m \le r_j}$
Clearly $j \ne \O$ as $n \in J$.
Let $k$ be the smallest element of $J$.
Then because $r_0 < m$:
- $k \ne 0$
Thus:
- $k \in \closedint 1 n$
By its definition:
- $r_{k - 1} < m \le r_k$
Thus, by Sum with One is Immediate Successor in Naturally Ordered Semigroup:
- $r_{k - 1} + 1 \le m \le r_k$
Therefore $m \in A_k$.
$\blacksquare$
![]() | Although this article appears correct, it's inelegant. There has to be a better way of doing it. In particular: A better link instead of Sum with One is Immediate Successor in Naturally Ordered Semigroup You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by redesigning it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Improve}} from the code.If you would welcome a second opinion as to whether your work is correct, add a call to {{Proofread}} the page. |
Sources
- 1965: Seth Warner: Modern Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text {III}$: The Natural Numbers: $\S 18$: Induced $N$-ary Operations: Theorem $18.3$