Subset is Right Compatible with Ordinal Multiplication
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
Let $x, y, z$ be ordinals.
Then:
- $x \le y \implies \paren {x \cdot z} \le \paren {y \cdot z}$
Proof
The proof shall proceed by Transfinite Induction on $z$.
Basis for the Induction
By definition of ordinal multiplication:
- $x \cdot 0 = 0$
so the statement simply reduces to:
- $0 \le 0$
This proves the basis for the induction.
Induction Step
\(\ds x\) | \(\le\) | \(\ds y\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds x \cdot z\) | \(\le\) | \(\ds y \cdot z\) | Inductive Hypothesis | ||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \paren {x \cdot z} + x\) | \(\le\) | \(\ds \paren {y \cdot z} + y\) | Membership is Left Compatible with Ordinal Addition and Subset is Right Compatible with Ordinal Addition | ||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds x \cdot z^+\) | \(\le\) | \(\ds y \cdot z^+\) | Definition of Ordinal Multiplication |
This proves the induction step.
Limit Case
\(\ds x\) | \(\le\) | \(\ds y\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \forall w \in z: \, \) | \(\ds x \cdot w\) | \(\le\) | \(\ds y \cdot w\) | Inductive Hypothesis | |||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \bigcup_{w \mathop \in z} \paren {x \cdot w}\) | \(\le\) | \(\ds \bigcup_{w \mathop \in z} \paren {y \cdot w}\) | Indexed Union Subset | ||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds x \cdot z\) | \(\le\) | \(\ds y \cdot z\) | Definition of Ordinal Multiplication |
This proves the limit case.
$\blacksquare$
Also see
Sources
- 1971: Gaisi Takeuti and Wilson M. Zaring: Introduction to Axiomatic Set Theory: $\S 8.21$