Sum of Adjacent Sequences of Triangular Numbers
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
\(\ds T_1 + T_2 + T_3\) | \(=\) | \(\ds T_4\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds T_5 + T_6 + T_7 + T_8\) | \(=\) | \(\ds T_9 + T_{10}\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds T_{11} + T_{12} + T_{13} + T_{14} + T_{15}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds T_{16} + T_{17} + T_{18}\) |
and so on.
The $n$th line of the pattern can be written as:
- $\ds \sum_{k \mathop = n^2 + n - 1}^{n^2 + 2 n} T_n = \sum_{k \mathop = n^2 + 2 n + 1}^{n^2 + 3 n} T_n$
Proof
\(\ds \sum_{k \mathop = n^2 + n - 1}^{n^2 + 2 n} T_n\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{n^2 + 2 n} T_n - \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{n^2 + n - 2} T_n\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds H_{n^2 + 2 n} - H_{n^2 + n - 2}\) | Definition of Tetrahedral Number | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \frac {\paren {n^2 + 2 n} \paren {n^2 + 2 n + 1} \paren {n^2 + 2 n + 2} } 6 - \frac {\paren {n^2 + n - 2} \paren {n^2 + n - 1} \paren {n^2 + n} } 6\) | Closed Form for Tetrahedral Numbers | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \frac {n \paren {n + 1} \paren {n + 2} } 6 \paren {\paren {n + 1} \paren {n^2 + 2 n + 2} - \paren {n - 1} \paren {n^2 + n - 1} }\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \frac {n \paren {n + 1} \paren {n + 2} } 6 \paren {3 n^2 + 6 n + 1}\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \frac {n \paren {n + 1} \paren {n + 2} } 6 \paren {\paren {n + 3} \paren {n^2 + 3 n + 1} - \paren {n + 1} \paren {n^2 + 2 n + 2} }\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \frac {\paren {n^2 + 3 n} \paren {n^2 + 3 n + 1} \paren {n^2 + 3 n + 2} } 6 - \frac {\paren {n^2 + 2 n} \paren {n^2 + 2 n + 1} \paren {n^2 + 2 n + 2} } 6\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds H_{n^2 + 3 n} - H_{n^2 + 2 n}\) | Closed Form for Tetrahedral Numbers | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{n^2 + 3 n} T_n - \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{n^2 + 2 n} T_n\) | Definition of Tetrahedral Number | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \sum_{k \mathop = n^2 + 2 n + 1}^{n^2 + 3 n} T_n\) |
$\blacksquare$
Historical Note
David Wells states in Curious and Interesting Numbers ($1986$) that this result was pointed out by M.N. Khatri, but fails to give details.
Sources
- 1986: David Wells: Curious and Interesting Numbers ... (previous) ... (next): $15$
- 1997: David Wells: Curious and Interesting Numbers (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $15$