# Talk:Solution to Linear First Order Ordinary Differential Equation

Jump to navigation
Jump to search

I think we should still keep the proof in Existence-Uniqueness Theorem for First-Order Differential Equation if the two articles are merged because it more clearly states the conditions on $P$ and $Q$ (the theorem fails for discontinuous functions in general). --Andrew Salmon 06:12, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

- The key word is "merge". --prime mover 06:19, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

**18Dec2019** --Gbgustafson (talk) 10:42, 18 December 2019 (EST): The **Also See** section links back to the same page. No specific instance.

- I'm afraid I don't understand.

- Incidentally, what is it about our general presentational and structural style that you hate so much? --prime mover (talk) 11:46, 18 December 2019 (EST)

- It is a garden variety typo. Click on the
**Also See**link and see if it changes the page. What I don't like is Lidl market potatoes recently, blue spots, cuts, dry rot and all. You don't have this potato problem?--Gbgustafson (talk) 14:35, 18 December 2019 (EST)

- It is a garden variety typo. Click on the

- Solution to Linear First Order ODE with Constant Coefficients is not the same page as Solution to Linear First Order Ordinary Differential Equation. What am I missing? --prime mover (talk) 17:26, 18 December 2019 (EST)