Talk:Symmetric Difference is Associative
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Can someone add another proof without using the set complement operator? This is because in ZF set theory it cannot be defined, as far as I know. The complement of the empty set is the universe, which should be a proper class and not a set. But ZF only deals with sets.
- If it comforts you, think of $R \cup S \cup T$ as the "universe" or the ambient set in this situation. Alternatively, think of $R \cap \overline S$ (the only sense in which complement is used in this proof) as simply an abbreviation for $\{x: x \in R \land x \notin S\}$. I hope that alleviates your concerns. — Lord_Farin (talk) 15:55, 1 July 2015 (UTC)