Union of Slowly Well-Ordered Class under Subset Relation is Well-Orderable
Theorem
Let $N$ be a class.
Let $N$ be slowly well-ordered under the subset relation.
Then $\bigcup N$ is well-orderable.
Proof
Let $N$ be slowly well-ordered under $\subseteq$.
Let $A = \bigcup N$.
For $a \in A$, let $\map F a$ denote the smallest element of $N$ that contains $a$.
Then for $a, b \in A$, we define $a \preccurlyeq b \iff \map F a \subseteq \map F b$.
It will be shown that $\preccurlyeq$ is a well-ordering on $A$.
By Class which has Injection to Subclass of Well-Orderable Class is Well-Orderable, it is sufficient to show that $F$ is an injection.
So, let us assume that $\map F a = \map F b$ for arbitrary $a, b \in A$.
By condition $S_1$ of the definition of slowly well-ordered under $\subseteq$, $\O \in N$ is the smallest element of $N$.
We have that $a \in \map F a$ by definition.
Hence $\map F a$ cannot be the smallest element of $N$.
Suppose $\map F a$ were a limit element of $N$.
Then by condition $S_3$ of the definition of slowly well-ordered under $\subseteq$, $\map F a$ would be the union of its lower section $\map \bigcup {\paren {\map F a}^\subset}$
But no element of the lower section of $\map F a$ can contain $a$.
Hence $\map \bigcup {\paren {\map F a}^\subset}$ cannot contain $a$.
Hence $\map F a$ cannot be a limit element of $N$.
By Categories of Elements under Well-Ordering, $\map F a$ must therefore be the immediate successor element of some $x \in N$.
As $a$ is the immediate predecessor of $x$, it follows by the definition of $\map F a$ that $a \notin x$.
However, by condition $S_2$ of the definition of slowly well-ordered under $\subseteq$, $\map F a$ contains exactly $1$ more element than $x$.
Hence as $a \in \map F a$ but $a \notin x$ it must be the case that $a$ must be that $1$ more element.
Hence:
- $\map F a = x \cup \set a$
As $\map F a = \map F b$ by hypothesis:
- $\map F b = x \cup \set a$
As $\map F b$ is the smallest element of $N$ that contains $b$, we have:
- $b \ne x$
Hence:
- $b \in \set a$
which means:
- $b = a$
We have shown that:
- $\map F a = \map F b \implies a = b$
and so by definition $F$ is an injection.
Thus, by Class which has Injection to Subclass of Well-Orderable Class is Well-Orderable, the result follows.
$\blacksquare$
The following results also hold:
Corollary 1
- $a \preccurlyeq b \iff \forall x \in N: b \subseteq x \implies a \subseteq x$
Corollary 2
- $\forall x \in N, a \in \bigcup N: x \in \map F a \implies x \preccurlyeq a$
Corollary 3
- $\forall a \in \bigcup N:$ if $a$ is not the greatest element of $\bigcup N$, then the immediate successor of $a$ is the smallest element of $\bigcup N \setminus \map F a$.
Corollary 4
- Every immediate successor element of $N$ is $\map F a$ for some $a \in N$.
Sources
- 2010: Raymond M. Smullyan and Melvin Fitting: Set Theory and the Continuum Problem (revised ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $4$: Superinduction, Well Ordering and Choice: Part $\text I$ -- Superinduction and Well Ordering: $\S 4$ Well ordering and choice: Theorem $4.4$