Welcome to ProofWiki! Since you're new, you may want to check out the general help page. It's the best first stop to see how things are done (next to reading proofs, of course!). Please feel free to contribute to whichever area of mathematics interests you, either by adding new proofs, or fixing up existing ones. If you have any questions please feel free to contact , or post your question on the questions page.
Here are some useful pages to help get you started:
- Community Portal - To see what needs to be done, and keep up to date with the community.
- Recent Changes - To keep up with what's new, and what's being added.
- Check out our house style if you are keen on contributing.
- Main Page talk - This is where most of the main discussions regarding the direction of the site take place. If you have any ideas, please share them!
- --Your friendly ProofWiki WelcomeBot 03:20, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Rewriting existing pages
Two points here.
If the contents of a page do not match the title, it is usually not the best practice to rewrite the contents of the page. The problem is usually that the page has been badly titled. It is better to amend the title (or put a rename request in) rather than amend the contents.
The reason for this is that any pages which link to that page probably rely upon the contents of that page and not the rewritten version, and so the integrity of the proofs that depend on that page are compromised.
It takes considerable effort to maintain the interlinking between all the various pages on this wiki. It is one of the most important aspects of it. Links which become broken and misdirected are unacceptable, and very great care needs to be taken.
In this particular instance, the page Existence of Minimal Infinite Successor Set apparently did not do as it was purported - in fact it proved that of all infinite successor sets, the minimal infinite successor set was the minimal one. (Frankly I can't see the difference.)
If the contents of a page contain a proof that you don't like very much, or that (in your opinion) you have a better one, please do not remove the existing proof and replace it with your own. Add a new proof in a transclusion page and refactor the existing proof into its own transcluded page and thus include both.