Ackermann-Péter Function is Strictly Increasing on Second Argument

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Theorem

For all $x, y \in \N$:

$\map A {x, y + 1} > \map A {x, y}$

where $A$ is the Ackermann-Péter function.


General Result

For all $x, y, z \in \N$ such that:

$y < z$

we have:

$\map A {x, y} < \map A {x, z}$

where $A$ is the Ackermann-Péter function.


Proof

Proceed by induction on $x$.

Basis for the Induction

Suppose $x = 0$.

Then:

\(\ds \map A {0, y + 1}\) \(=\) \(\ds y + 2\) Definition of Ackermann-Péter Function
\(\ds \) \(>\) \(\ds y + 1\)
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \map A {0, y}\) Definition of Ackermann-Péter Function

This is the basis for the induction.

$\Box$


Induction Hypothesis

This is the induction hypothesis:

Suppose that:

$\map A {x, y + 1} > \map A {x, y}$

We want to show that:

$\map A {x + 1, y + 1} > \map A {x + 1, y}$


Induction Step

This is the induction step:

\(\ds \map A {x + 1, y + 1}\) \(=\) \(\ds \map A {x, \map A {x + 1, y} }\) Definition of Ackermann-Péter Function
\(\ds \) \(>\) \(\ds \map A {x + 1, y}\) Ackermann-Péter Function is Greater than Second Argument

$\Box$


By the Principle of Mathematical Induction, the result holds.

$\blacksquare$