Axiom talk:Lower Dimensional Axiom

I need to stop rushing and be more accurate :( I will try to take this lesson in character development to heart --GFauxPas 08:49, 24 January 2012 (EST)

To LF: My formulation is the way it appears in the journal. Is the way you formulated it equivalent? I think it might be, but compare it to the version I put up to make sure. --GFauxPas 08:58, 24 January 2012 (EST)

We were both in error. You had missed out a $<$ for a $\le$, rendering the first $\bigwedge$ an inequality of $n$, not $n-1$ points. Then I adjusted the 'Intuition' to match these $n$ points. However, the axiom in the pdf states $n-1$ distinct points. It is correct now. --Lord_Farin 09:52, 24 January 2012 (EST)