Banach-Tarski Paradox/Lemma 2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Lemma for Banach-Tarski Paradox
Relation Definition
Let $\approx$ denote the relation between sets in Euclidean space of $3$ dimensions defined as follows:
- $X \approx Y$
- there exists a partition of $X$ into disjoint sets:
- $X = X_1 \cup X_2 \cup \cdots \cup X_m$
- and a partition of $Y$ into the same number of disjoint sets:
- $Y = Y_1 \cup Y_2 \cup \cdots \cup Y_m$
such that $X_i$ is congruent to $Y_i$ for each $i \in \set {1, 2, \ldots, m}$.
Let $X$ and $Y$ be disjoint unions of $X_1, X_2$ and $Y_1, Y_2$ respectively.
Let $X_i \approx Y_i$ for each $i \in \set {1, 2}$.
Then:
- $X \approx Y$
Proof
![]() | This theorem requires a proof. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by crafting such a proof. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{ProofWanted}} from the code.If you would welcome a second opinion as to whether your work is correct, add a call to {{Proofread}} the page. |
Sources
- 1973: Thomas J. Jech: The Axiom of Choice ... (previous) ... (next): $1.$ Introduction: $1.3$ A paradoxical decomposition of the sphere: Lemma $1.5$