Characterization of Paracompactness in T3 Space/Lemma 21
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This article needs proofreading. Please check it for mathematical errors. If you believe there are none, please remove {{Proofread}} from the code.To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Proofread}} from the code. |
Theorem
Let $X$ be a set.
Let $X \times X$ denote the Cartesian product of $X$ with itself.
Let $\BB$ be a set of subsets of $X$.
Let $W \subseteq X \times X$ be symmetric as a relation on $X \times X$.
Then:
- $\forall B \in \BB, x \in X : \map W x \cap W \sqbrk B \ne \O \leadsto \map {W \circ W} x \cap B \ne \O$
where:
- $\map W x$ denotes the image of $x$ under the relation $W$
- $W \sqbrk B$ denotes the image of $B$ under the relation $W$
- $W \circ W$ denotes the composite relation of $W$ with itself
Proof
Let $B \in \BB$.
Let $x \in X$.
Let $y \in \map W x \cap W \sqbrk B$.
By definition of intersection:
- $y \in \map W x$
and
- $y \in W \sqbrk B$
By definition of image of element:
- $\tuple{x, y} \in W$
By definition of symmetric:
- $\tuple{y, x} \in W$
By definition of image of subset:
- $\exists z \in B : \tuple{z, y} \in W$
By definition of composite relation:
- $\exists z \in B : \tuple{z, x} \in W \circ W$
By definition of image of element:
- $z \in \map {W \circ W} x \cap B$
Hence:
- $\map {W \circ W} x \cap B \ne \O$
Since $B$ and $x$ were arbitrary, then:
- $\forall B \in \BB, x \in X : \map W x \cap W \sqbrk B \ne \O \leadsto \map {W \circ W} x \cap B \ne \O$
$\blacksquare$