Choice Function for Set does not imply Choice Function for Union of Set/Mistake
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Source Work
2010: Raymond M. Smullyan and Melvin Fitting: Set Theory and the Continuum Problem (revised ed.):
- Chapter $4$: Superinduction, Well Ordering and Choice: Part $\text I$ -- Superinduction and Well Ordering:
- $\S 4$ Well ordering and choice:
- Exercise $4.3$
- $\S 4$ Well ordering and choice:
Mistake
- Show that if there exists a choice function for $S$ then there exists a choice function for $\bigcup S$.
Analysis
The statement is not provable from the axioms of Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory because the statement implies the Axiom of Choice but Axiom of Choice is Independent of ZF.
To show this, let $A$ be an arbitrary set.
Then, by the Axiom of Pairing, there exists a set
- $S = \set A$
with $A$ as its only element.
There exists a choice function:
- $f: \powerset S \setminus \set \O \to S$
for $S$ that maps the single element:
- $\set A \in \powerset S \setminus \set \O$
in its domain to $A$.
The union of $S$ is
- $\bigcup S = A$
If the given statement is true, then there exists a choice function for every set $A$.
Sources
- 2010: Raymond M. Smullyan and Melvin Fitting: Set Theory and the Continuum Problem (revised ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $4$: Superinduction, Well Ordering and Choice: Part $\text I$ -- Superinduction and Well Ordering: $\S 4$ Well ordering and choice: Exercise $4.3$