Class Equality Extension of Set Equality
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
Let $=_s$ denote set equality.
Let $=_c$ denote class equality.
Let $x$ and $y$ be sets.
Then $x =_s y$ if and only if $x =_c y$.
Proof
\(\ds x\) | \(=_s\) | \(\ds y\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \leadstoandfrom \ \ \) | \(\ds \forall z: \, \) | \(\ds \leftparen {z \in x}\) | \(\iff\) | \(\ds \rightparen {z \in y}\) | Definition of Set Equality | |||||||||
\(\ds \leadstoandfrom \ \ \) | \(\ds x\) | \(=_c\) | \(\ds y\) | Definition of Class Equality, Class Membership is Extension of Set Membership |
$\blacksquare$
![]() | The validity of the material on this page is questionable. In particular: This has been put in the category Category:Zermelo-Fraenkel Class Theory. Should it really be that specific? Does it not also apply to Definition:NBG for example? Or others? Complete review of the applicability of this is of high importance, because I believe that upon this depends the applicability of identifying a small class with a set. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by resolving the issues. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Questionable}} from the code.If you would welcome a second opinion as to whether your work is correct, add a call to {{Proofread}} the page. |