Converse of Euclid's Lemma does not Hold

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Lemma

Let $n \in Z_{>0}$ be a positive composite number

Let $a b \equiv 0 \pmod n$.

Then it is not necessarily the case that either $a \equiv 0 \pmod n$ or $b \equiv 0 \pmod n$.


Proof

Let $n = 6$.

We have that:

$6 \equiv 0 \pmod 6$

but:

$2 \equiv 2 \pmod 6$
$3 \equiv 3 \pmod 6$

Hence the result by Proof by Counterexample.

$\blacksquare$


Sources