<section notitle="true" name="tc">
Let $\mathcal L$ be a formal language whose alphabet is $\mathcal A$.
The formal grammar of $\mathcal L$ comprises of rules of formation, which determine whether collations in $\mathcal A$ belong to $\mathcal L$ or not.
Roughly speaking, there are two types of formal grammar, top-down grammar and bottom-up grammar.
A top-down grammar for $\mathcal L$ is a formal grammar which allows well-formed formulas to be built from a single metasymbol.
Such a grammar can be made explicit by declaring that:
From the words thus generated, those not containing any metasymbols are the well-formed formulas.
A bottom-up grammar for $\mathcal L$ is a formal grammar whose rules of formation allow the user to build well-formed formulas from primitive symbols, in the following way:
In certain use cases, the first clause is adjusted to allow for more complex situations, for example in the bottom-up specification of predicate logic
The extremal clause of a bottom-up grammar is the final rule which excludes all collations other than those specified in the formation rules from being well-formed formulas.
Also known as
The formal grammar may also be called syntax; however, a convenient viewpoint is to think of the formal grammar as explicating the syntax for the associated formal language.
Thus the formal grammar is a means to obtain a syntax for $\mathcal L$, and multiple formal grammars may yield the same syntax.
Some sources call this merely a grammar, the term formal being taken for granted by the fact that a formal language is under discussion.