Definition:Formal Semantics
Definition
Let $\LL$ be a formal language.
A formal semantics for $\LL$ comprises:
Often, a formal semantics provides these by using a lot of auxiliary definitions.
Structure
Part of specifying a formal semantics $\mathscr M$ for $\LL$ is to specify structures $\MM$ for $\mathscr M$.
A structure can in principle be any object one can think of.
However, to get a useful formal semantics, the structures should support a meaningful definition of validity for the WFFs of $\LL$.
It is common that structures are sets, often endowed with a number of relations or functions.
Validity
Part of specifying a formal semantics $\mathscr M$ for $\LL$ is to define a notion of validity.
Concretely, a precise meaning needs to be assigned to the phrase:
It can be expressed symbolically as:
- $\MM \models_{\mathscr M} \phi$
Examples
Boolean Interpretations
Let $\LL_0$ be the language of propositional logic.
The boolean interpretations for $\LL_0$ can be interpreted as a formal semantics for $\LL_0$, which we denote by $\mathrm{BI}$.
The structures of $\mathrm{BI}$ are the boolean interpretations.
A WFF $\phi$ is declared ($\mathrm{BI}$-)valid in a boolean interpretation $v$ if and only if:
- $\map v \phi = \T$
Symbolically, this can be expressed as:
- $v \models_{\mathrm{BI}} \phi$
![]() | Although this article appears correct, it's inelegant. There has to be a better way of doing it. In particular: Extension would be useful to fold the above (see Definition:Tautology/Formal Semantics). But maybe this section should just be a link to an examples category You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by redesigning it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Improve}} from the code.If you would welcome a second opinion as to whether your work is correct, add a call to {{Proofread}} the page. |
Constructed Semantics
Let $\LL$ be a formal language.
A constructed semantics for $\LL$ is a formal semantics which is invented solely for proving a property about $\LL$ or other entities related to $\LL$.
Also see
- Results about formal semantics can be found here.